Skip to main content

Another Look

Submitted by an LD OnLine user on

Effects of Toxic Metals on Learning Ability and Behavior

Bernard Windham, Editor

I. Mechanisms of Developmental Damage by Toxic Metals

The human brain forms and develops over a long period of time compared to other organs, with neuron proliferation and migration continuing in the postnatal period. The blood-brain barrier is not fully developed until the middle of the first year of life. Similarly there is postnatal activity in the development of neuronal receptors and transmitter systems, as well as in the production of myelin. The fetus has been found to get significant exposure to toxic substances through maternal blood and across the placenta, with fetal levels of toxic metals often being higher than that of maternal blood (19, 30-32, 41-43). Likewise, infants have been found to get significant exposure to toxics, such as mercury and organochlorine compounds that their mother is exposed to, through breast-feeding (26, 30-32, 43, 101, 107). Other toxic exposures are also extremely common as documented in Section IV.

The incidence of neurotoxic or immune reactive conditions such as autism, schizophrenia, ADD, dyslexia, learning disabilities, etc. have been increasing rapidly in recent years (2, 80-82). A recent report by the National Research Council found that 50% of all pregnancies in the U.S. are now resulting in prenatal or postnatal mortality, significant birth defects, developmental neurological problems, or otherwise chronically unhealthy babies (82). There has been a similar sharp increase in developmental conditions in Canadian children (132), including increases in learning disabilities and behavioral problems, asthma and allergies, and childhood cancer. Exposure to toxic chemicals or environmental factors appear to be a factor in as much as 28 percent of the 4 million U.S. children born each year (6-23), with at least 1 in 6 having one of the neurological conditions previously listed according to the U.S. Census Bureau (82c). U.S. EPA estimates that over 3 million of these are related to lead or mercury toxicity (2, 41, 81, 108). Evidence indicates that over 60,000 children are born each year with neurodevelopmental impairment due to methylmercury (107), with even higher levels of exposure and impairment from two other sources: vaccines and mother’s amalgam dental fillings (43, 81). The level of exposure in most infants to mercury thimerosal has been found to be many times higher than the federal limits for mercury exposure (81, 122). The largest increase in neurological problems has been in infants (2, 80-82), with an increase in autism cases to over 500,000 (2, 80-82, 43b), an over 500% increase to a level of almost 1 per 300 infants in the last decade (80), making it the 3rd most common chronic childhood condition, along with similar increases in ADD (2, 41, 43b, 83, 88).

Studies have found that heavy metals such as mercury, cadmium, lead, aluminum, and tin affect chemical synaptic transmission in the brain and the peripheral and central nervous system (19, 24, 25, 37-40, 43, 57). They also have been found to disrupt brain and cellular calcium levels that significantly affect many body functions such as: (a) calcium levels in the brain affecting cognitive development and degenerative CNS diseases (5, 28, 43, 74); (b) calcium-dependent neurotransmitter release which results in depressed levels of serotonin, norepinephrine, and acetylcholine (5, 19, 28, 44-47, 43, 83, 110)—related to mood and motivation; (c) cellular calcium-sodium ATP pump processes affecting cellular nutrition and energy production processes (5, 28, 43) and; (d) calcium levels in bones causing skeletal osteodystery (5, 74). Toxic metals have also been found to affect cellular transfer and levels of other important minerals and nutrients that have significant neurological and health effects such as magnesium, lithium, zinc, iron, vitamins B6 & B1-12 (5, 27, 43, 46, 75, 83). Based on thousands of hair tests, at least 20% of Americans are deficient in magnesium and lithium (5, 68, 76, 83), with zinc deficiencies also common (123). The resulting deficiency of such essential nutrients has been shown to increase toxic metal neurological damage (5, 43, 74, 75, 83).

Lithium protects brain cells against excess glutamate and calcium, and low levels cause abnormal brain cell balance and neurological disturbances (75, 79). Lithium also is important in vitamin B12 transport and distribution, and studies have found low lithium levels common in learning disabled children, incarcerated violent criminals, and people with heart disease (76, 78).

Lithium supplementation has been found to be an effective treatment adjunct in conditions such as bipolar depression, autism, and schizophrenia where mania or extreme hyperactivity is seen (104, 79). It has been documented that conditions like depression and other chronic neurological conditions often involve damage and nerve cell death in areas of the brain like the hippocampus, and lithium has been found to not only prevent such damage but also promote cell gray matter cell growth in such areas (79), and to be effective in treating not only depressive conditions but degenerative conditions like Huntington’s Disease which are related to such damage.

In one study, a group including violent offenders and family abusers were divided into 2 groups; half got lithium supplements and half a placebo. The group getting lithium had significantly increased scores for mood, happiness, friendliness, and energy, while the other group did not (77). Similar results were obtained for a group of violent former drug users. In a large Texas study, incidence of suicide, homicide, rape, robbery, burglary, theft, and drug use were significantly higher in counties with low lithium levels in drinking water (78). In a placebo controlled study on prisoners with a history of impulsive/aggressive behavior, the group taking lithium supplements had a significant reduction in aggressive behavior and infractions involving violence (78). The authors suggest that for those areas with low lithium levels in water, water systems should add lithium; and those with deficiencies in lithium or displaying aggressive or impulsive behavior would likely benefit from lithium supplements (78).

Studies have also found heavy metals to deplete glutathione and bind to protein-bound sulfhydryl SH groups, resulting in inhibiting SH-containing enzymes and production of reactive oxygen species such as superoxide ion, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl radical (39, 43, 45-47). In addition to forming strong bonds with SH and other groups like OH, NH2, and Cl in amino acids which interfere with basic enzymatic processes, toxic metals exert part of their toxic effects by replacing essential metals such as zinc at their sites in enzymes. An example of this is mercury’s disabling of the metallothionein protein, which is necessary for the transport and detoxification of metals. Mercury inhibits sulfur ligands in MT and in the case of intestinal cell membranes inactivates MT that normally binds cuprous ions (125), thus allowing buildup of copper to toxic levels in many and malfunction of the Zn/Cu SOD function. Mercury induced reactive oxygen species and lipid peroxidation has been found to be a major factor in mercury’s neurotoxicity, along with leading to decreased levels of glutathione peroxidation and superoxide dismutase (SOD) (39). This has been found to be a major factor in neurological and immune damage caused by the heavy metals, including damage to mitochondria and DNA (37-40, 43), as well as chronic autoimmune conditions and diseases (29) .

Although vaccinations appear to be the largest source of mercury in infants, mercury has been found to be transmitted from the mother to the fetus through the placenta and accumulate in the fetus to higher levels than in the mother’s blood (30, 43). Breast milk of women who have amalgam fillings is the second largest source of mercury in infants and young children (43, 69), but eating a lot of fish has also been found to be a significant source of methyl mercury (101). Milk increases the bioavailability and retention of mercury by as much as double (43, 131, 31) and mercury is often stored in breast milk and the fetus at much higher levels than that in the mother’s tissues (43, 31). Mercury is transferred mainly by binding to casein (131, 92). The level of mercury in breast milk was found to be significantly correlated with the number of amalgam fillings (31, 43), with milk from mothers with 7 or more fillings having levels in milk approx. 10 times that of amalgam-free mothers. The mercury in milk sampled ranged from 0.2 to 6.9 ug/L. Prenatal mercury exposure can also developmentally damage the metals detox system of the liver which can lead to accumulation and toxicity of later metals exposure (43).

High lead, copper, manganese, or mercury levels have been found to be associated with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), impulsivity, anger, aggression, inability to inhibit inappropriate responding, juvenile delinquency, and criminality (19, 20a, 21, 61, 83, 122, 133, 135, 136, 43). It has been found that excess levels of copper can cause violent behavior in children (124). Likewise mercury has been found to be a factor in anger and mood disorders (135, 133a). Manganese toxicity has long been known to be associated with impulsive and violent behavior (37, 61, 134). Lead has been the subject of extensive research documenting its relation to all of these conditions (19-21, 61,etc.).

High aluminum levels have been found to be related to encephalopathies and dementia (49). “Recent studies suggest that aluminum contributes to neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, senile and presenile dementia, clumsiness of movements, staggering when walking, and inability to pronounce words properly”. Arsenic, like most of the other metals, has been found in studies to be associated with neurological, vascular, dermatological, and carcinogenic effects, along with reproductive effects (100). A comparison of areas with higher levels of arsenic in the water supply found higher fetal and infant mortality in areas with higher arsenic levels and higher cancer rates. Cadmium is also a known carcinogen (100c,d). Some of the developmental effects documented to be caused by low level toxic metal exposure include developmental delays, growth problems, slower reaction times, diminished intellectual ability, behavior problems, poor balance and motor function, hearing loss, attention deficit disorder, etc.(19, 43, etc.)

Many individuals have been found to be more sensitive to toxic metals depending on genetic sensitivity and past exposure to toxic substances (28, 29). Nickel exposure is common and nickel exposure has been found to be significantly related to perinatal unthriftiness and mortality in animal studies. Large numbers of people affected by allergic conditions such as eczema and psoriasis vulgaris (59) and serious autoimmune conditions such as lupus and CFS have been found to be immune reactive to nickel or mercury (28).

Other agents including mercury are known to accumulate in endocrine system organs such as the pituitary gland, thyroid, and hypothalamus and to alter hormone levels and endocrine system development during crucial periods of development (33, 37, 43, 27, 109, 111). Such effects are usually permanent and affect the individual throughout their life. Pregnant women who suffer from hypothyroidism (underactive thyroid) have a four-time greater risk for miscarriage during the second trimester than those who don’t, and women with untreated thyroid deficiency were four-times more likely to have a child with developmental disabilities and lower IQ (111). Some of the documented effects of exposure to toxic metals include significant learning and behavioral disabilities, mental retardation, autism, etc. But even some of the relatively subtle effects that have been found to occur, such as small decreases in IQ, attention span, and connections to delinquency and violence, if they occur in relatively large numbers over a lifetime can have potentially serious consequences for individuals as well as for society (26, 37, 41, 42, 115, 136).

The incidence of neurological conditions in children, such as autism, has increased over 500% in the last decade (80), along with similar increases in ADD and other pervasive developmental diseases (PDD). Autism is a condition that was unknown prior to the 1940s but whose incidence has increased so rapidly that it is currently the 3rd leading childhood neurological condition and the current incidence in approximately 1 in 300, and 1 in 150 in some communities surveyed in Maryland (80). Millions of kids are currently afflicted with PDD conditions. Mercury and other toxic metals have been found to be a factor in most of those tested (81, 99). Vaccinations that use mercury thimerosal as a preservative appear to be a common factor in these conditions (81, 83, 99, 122). A study at the U.S. CDC found “statistically significant associations” between certain neurologic developmental disorders, such as attention deficit disorder (ADD) and autism, with exposure to mercury from thimerosal-containing vaccines before the age of 6 months (122).

A direct mechanism involving mercury’s inhibition of cellular enzymatic processes by binding with the hydroxyl radical (SH) in amino acids appears to be a major part of the connection to these allergic/immune reactive conditions (81, 83, 89-91, 97, 105). For example, mercury has been found to strongly inhibit the activity of xanthine oxidase and dipeptyl peptidase (DPP IV) which are required in the digestion of the milk protein casein (89, 91, 93), and the same protein that is cluster differentiation antigen 26 (CD26) which helps T lymphocyte activation. CD26 or DPPIV is a cell surfact glycoprotein that is very susceptible to inactivation by mercury binding to its cysteinyl domain. Mercury and other toxic metals also inhibit binding of opioid receptor agonists to opioid receptors, while magnesium stimulates binding to opioid receptors (89). Studies involving a large sample of autistic and schizophrenic patients found that over 90% of those tested had high levels of the milk protein beta-casomorphin-7 in their blood and urine and defective enzymatic processes for digesting milk protein (92, 93, 83), and similarly for the corresponding enzyme needed to digest wheat gluten (92, 94).The studies found high levels of Ig A antigen specific antibodies for casein, lactalbumin and beta-lactoglobulin and IgG and IgM for casein. Beta-casomorphine-7 is a morphine like compound that results in neural dysfunction (92), as well as being a direct histamine releaser in humans and inducing skin reactions (91c, 92). Similarly many also had a corresponding form of gluten protein (94). Elimination of milk and wheat products and sulfur foods from the diet has been found to improve the condition. A double blind study using a potent opiate antagonist, naltrexone (NAL), produced significant reduction in autistic symptomology among the 56% most responsive to opioid effects (95). The behavioral improvement was accompanied by alterations in the distribution of the major lymphocyte subsets, with a significant increase in the T-helper-inducers and a significant reduction of the T-cytotoxic-suppressors and a normalization of the CD4/CD8 ratio. Studies have found mercury causes increased levels of the CD8 T-cytotoxic-suppressors (96). As noted previously, such populations of patients have also been found to have high levels of mercury and to recover after mercury detox (29, 81, 83, 99, 43). As mercury levels are reduced, the protein binding is reduced and improvement in the enzymatic process occurs (29, 43, 83).

Additional cellular level enzymatic effects of mercury’s binding with proteins include blockage of sulfur oxidation processes and neurotransmitter amino acids which have been found to be significant factors in many autistics (90, 97, 105, 83), plus enzymatic processes involving vitamins B6 and B12, with effects on the cytochrome-C energy processes as well.

The activating enzyme B6-kinase is totally inhibited in the intestine at extremely low levels (nanomolar) of mercury (121), with similar effects on B12. Epson salts (magnesium sulfate) baths, supplementation with the p5p form of vitamin B6 and vitamin B12 shots are methods of dealing with these enzymatic blockages that have been found effective by those treating such conditions. Mercury and toxic metals have also been found to have adverse effects on cellular mineral levels of calcium, magnesium, zinc, and lithium (46, 43, 83). Supplementing with these minerals has also been found to be effective in the majority of cases (46, 68-70). Another of the results of these toxic exposures and enzymatic blockages is the effect on the liver and dysfunction of the liver detoxification processes which autistic children have been found to have (81, 97, 43). All of the autistic cases tested were found to have high toxic exposures/effects and liver detoxification profiles outside of normal (81c).

II. Extent of Exposure of Children to Toxic Metals

The U.S. Center for Disease Control ranks toxic metals as the number one environmental health threat to children, adversely affecting large numbers of children in the U.S. each year and thousands in Florida (1-4, 108). According to an EPA/ATSDR assessment, the toxic metals lead, mercury, and arsenic are the top 3 toxics having the most adverse health effects on the public based on toxicity and current exposure levels in the U.S. (1), with cadmium, chromium, and nickel also highly listed. According to the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, an estimated one out of every 6 children in the U.S. have blood levels of lead in the toxic range (87), and studies estimate that over 12 million children suffer from learning, developmental, and behavioral disabilities including ADD, autism, schizophrenia, and mental retardation (87, 82, 42). Large numbers of people have been found to have allergic conditions and immune reactive autoimmune conditions due to the toxic metals, especially inorganic mercury and nickel (28, 29).

The heavy metals (lead, mercury, cadmium, nickel) tend to concentrate in the air and in the food chain along with other toxic metals like and aluminum, facilitating metal poisoning which is the most widespread environmental disorder in the U.S (1-4, 34). Mercury and cadmium from combustion emissions are also accumulating in coastal estuaries and inland water body sediments, and are widespread in shellfish and other organisms (34-36). Mercury and cadmium are extremely toxic at very low levels and have serious impacts on the organisms in water bodies that accumulate them (34, 2). These heavy metals have also been found to be endocrine system disrupting chemicals and have been found to be having effects on the endocrine and reproductive systems of fish, animals, and people, similar to the reproductive and developmental effects of organochlorine chemicals (30, 33, 43). Estrogenic chemicals like mercury have been found in Florida wildlife at levels that feminized males to the extent of not being able to reproduce, and also had adverse effects on the female reproductive systems (33, 36). Similar effects have also been documented in humans (33, 37, 43).

III. Developmental Effects of Toxic Metals on Cognitive Ability and Behavior

According to studies reviewed, over 20% of the children in the U.S. have had their health or learning significantly adversely affected by toxic metals such as mercury, lead, and cadmium; and over 50% of children in some urban areas have been adversely affected. Significant behavioral effects were also documented. Such effects similarly affect adults (37, 43). Many epidemiologists believe the evidence demonstrates that over 50% of all U.S. children have had their learning ability or mental state significantly adversely affected by prenatal and/or postnatal exposure to toxic substances(1, 2, 87, 108, etc.). The toxic metals have been documented to be reproductive and developmental toxins, causing birth defects and damaging fetal development, as well as neurological effects, developmental delays, learning disabilities, depression, and behavioral abnormalities in many otherwise normal-appearing children (5-33, 37-43, 48c, 66, 83, 84, 112-115).

Prenatal exposure to 7 heavy metals was measured in a population of pregnant women at approximately 17 weeks gestation (9). Follow-up tests on the infants at 3 years of age found that the combined prenatal toxic exposure score was negatively related to performance on the McCarthy Scales of Children’s Abilities and positively related to the number of childhood illnesses reported. Many similar studies measuring child hair levels of the toxic metals aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury have found that these toxic metals have significant effects on learning ability and cognitive performance, explaining as much as 20% of cognitive differences among randomly tested children who have low levels of exposure not exceeding health guidelines for exposure to any of these metals (6-15, 17, 19). These toxic metals have been found to have synergistic negative effects on childhood development and cognitive ability (8, 13-15, 66).

Among those more significantly affected by neurological deficits or problems, the effects appear even more significant. Comparison of groups of children who are mentally retarded or significantly learning disabled to normal controls found significantly higher levels of toxic metals in the affected groups (7, 11, 17, 18, 21), with the level of the toxic metals and minerals known to be affected by them correctly identifying those with significant disabilities in from 90 to 98% of cases in the studies. A study of rural children with subtoxic exposure levels found significantly higher levels of lead and cadmium in a group of mildly retarded/borderline intelligence (IQ 55-84) than controls (11). 76% of the study group had one of 5 toxic metals exceeding the lab’s upper safety limit. A large study found that hair cadmium level is highly correlated with and predictive of very significant learning disability or mental retardation (18). Over 90% of those with hair cadmium levels of 0.4 parts per million or more were found to have significant disabilities and over 95% of those with levels above 0.7 were mentally retarded. In a group of students with normal range IQs who failed one subject area on a standardized test (paradiagatic LD), the group’s cadmium and lead hair levels were significantly higher than controls; and hair metal levels with lithium levels included correctly separated the groups with 95% accuracy (7). Average hair cadmium levels in the group with learning disabilities were 1.7 ppm. Similar findings regarding toxic metal exposure levels were found for dyslexic children (10), schizophrenic children (16), and autistic children (16). A study of dyslexic children with normal IQs found the dyslexic group had a cadmium hair level average of 2.6 ppm, 25 times that of the control group (10) and exceeding the maximum of the normal acceptable range. The dyslexic group also had somewhat higher aluminum and copper levels. Studies of groups with schizophrenia have found increased levels of copper and mercury and reduced levels of zinc, magnesium, and calcium, which are known to be inhibited by heavy metals and affect neurotransmitter levels (48, 49).

These toxic metals have also been found similarly to have significant behavioral and emotional effects on children and adults (6-8, 11, 14-16, 19, 21, 43, 83). One group of students were scored by their classroom teacher on the Walker Problem Behavior Identification Checklist (WPBIC). A combined hair level score for mercury, lead, arsenic, cadmium, and aluminum was found to be significantly related to increased scores on the WPBIC subscales measuring acting-out, disturbed peer relations, immaturity, and the total score(6) among a population of students with no known acute exposures. The combined metals score explained 23% of the difference of the total WPBIC score, and 16 to 29% of the differences on the subscales for withdrawal, acting out, disturbed peer relations, distractibility, and immaturity (6). Similar results were found in the other studies, and have been found to have implications not only in the classroom but on relations at home, on driving habits, and on job performance.

Studies have found evidence that abnormal metal and trace elements affected by metal exposure appear to be a factor associated with aggressive or violent behavior (37, 60-63, 110, 113-115, 21), and that hair trace metal analysis may be a useful tool for identifying those prone to such behavior. It has been found that excess levels of copper can cause violent behavior in children (124). One mechanism found to be associated with toxic metals and pesticides relation to aggressive and violent behavior is the documented inhibition of cholinesterase activity in the brain (110). Another series of studies found abnormal trace metal concentrations to be associated with violent-prone individuals including elevated serum copper and depressed plasma zinc (115). Similar tests in the California juvenile justice system as well as other studies have found significant relations to classroom achievement, juvenile delinquency, and criminality (63, 120, 136). Three studies in the California prison system found those in prison for violent activity had significantly higher levels of hair manganese than controls (61, 37), while other studies in the California prison and juvenile justice systems found that those with 5 or more essential mineral imbalances were 90% more likely to be violent, 50% more likely to be violent for 2 or more mineral imbalances (120). In studies at juvenile delinquency centers, nutritional therapy reduced antisocial and violent behavior by over 50% (120).

A study analyzing hair of 28 mass murderers found that all had high metals and abnormal essential mineral levels (115). Like several other studies, they found higher levels of such toxic metals in blacks than in Caucasian populations. Studies of an area in Australia with much higher levels of violence as well as autopsies of several mass murderers also found high levels of manganese to be a common factor (37). Such violent behavior has long been known in those with high manganese exposure. Doctors in UK found a woman’s insanity and violent behavior to be related to poisoning from leaking amalgam dental fillings (37), and other studies and clinical results have confirmed the connection of toxic metals to behavioral problems and violence (114, 115, 119, 120, 136). Studies at the Argonne National Laboratory found that the majority of delinquents and criminals had high metals levels such as cadmium and lead, and to fall into 2 categories. One group with high copper and low zinc, sodium, potassium tended to have extreme tempers, while another group with low zinc and copper, but high sodium and potassium tended to be sociopathic (115). But it was found that treatment of delinquent or violent prone individuals for metals related problems including nutritional therapy usually produced significant improvements in mood, violent behavior, and functionality—with complete cure in the majority of cases (115, 119, 120).

Toxic metals and the resulting mineral imbalances have also been found to be a major cause of depression and mood disorders including schizophrenia and mania (43, 48, 69, 70, 83, 84, 112-114, 19, 21, 66). Some factors that have been documented in depression, impulsiveness, and violent behavior are low serotonin levels, abnormal glucose tolerance (hypoglycemia), and low chromium and folate levels (126-130), of which mercury has also been found to be a cause. One mechanism by which mercury has been found to be a factor in aggressiveness and violence is its documented inhibition of the brain neurotransmitter acetylcholinesterase (5, 19, 28, 44-47, 43, 83, 110). Low serotonin levels and/or hypoglycemia have also been found in the majority of those with impulsive and violent behavior (127, 128). Toxic metals also influence mood and depression by affecting balances of essential minerals and essential fatty acids, along with blocking essential enzymatic processes resulting in morphine like substances in the blood, and affecting levels of most brain neurotransmitters. Another well documented mechanism of toxic metal depression inducement is through reducing amino acid levels such as tryptophan and tyrosine which is documented to result in inducing depression (83, 85, 86, 66), while another is mercury’s promotion of Candida albicans overgrowth (112) . Mercury and lead have been documented to be causes of autism, schizophrenia, mania, ADD, and depression (81, 83, 113, 114, 23, 43, 48c, 19, 66), while vanadium has been found to be a cause of depressive psychosis and mania (84). Mercury accumulates in the pituitary gland (43, 109) and thus has endocrine system/hormonal effects. In addition to having estrogenic effects, mercury has other documented hormonal effects including lowered levels of neurotransmitters dopamine, serotonin, and

norepinephrine (43, 66). Some of the effect on depression is also related to mercury’s effect of reducing the level of posterior pituitary hormone (oxytocin). Low levels of pituitary function are associated with depression and suicidal thoughts, and appear to be a major factor in suicide of teenagers and other vulnerable groups. Amalgam fillings, nickel and gold crowns are major factors in reducing pituitary function (109, 43). Supplementary oxytocin extract has been found to alleviate many of these mood problems (35), along with replacement of metals in the mouth (109, 43).

Studies have previously found that low levels of lead exposure is significantly related to hyperactivity and attention deficit (19, 20a, 21, 83, 114), depression (48, 113, 114), school cognitive performance (19, 20a, 22, 23, 48, 50, 60a), behavioral problems (19, 21, 22, 23, 48, 115), mental disorders (24, 48, 115), allergies (60), growth (54), gestational age (54), and spontaneous abortions (60). In one study children’s umbilical cord blood at birth was recorded and a teacher assessment of learning/behavioral characteristics completed at the end of the school year at age 8 (20a). Girls with higher than average( > 10 ug/dL) chord blood level were found to be more likely to be dependent, inpersistant, and have an inflexible approach to tasks (10 ug/dL blood approx. 8 ppm hair, #52). Boys with higher than average chord blood level were found to be more likely to have problems following simple directions or sequences of directions. A follow up study to the Cincinnati lead study measured blood lead levels and compared to standardized IQ test scores at approximately 6.5 years of age (50). The study found blood lead levels were significantly inversely related to both full-scale and performance IQ, and that blood lead levels over 20 ug/dL were related to an average deficit in IQ of 7 points on performance IQ as compared to those with below 10 ug/dL blood lead levels. Another study in Australia measured IQ at approximately 12 years of age and compared to blood lead levels measured from 1 to 7 years of age (51). Total, verbal, and performance IQ were all significantly inversely related with blood lead levels measured during the first 7 years of life. Two studies found average hair lead levels in groups of learning disabled children over 20 ppm (7, 12), compared to 4 ppm in controls.

But the author of a recent study (23) states that “There is no safe level of blood lead”. Children with a lead concentration of 7 to 10 micrograms per deciliter of blood scored an average of 11.1 points lower than the mean on the Stanford-Binet IQ test, the researchers found. The study also found an average 5.5-point decline in IQ for every additional 10-microgram increase in blood-lead concentration, said Dr. Lanphear.

However, other studies have pointed out that these studies generally did not investigate or consider the effects and synergistic interactions of the other toxic metals (6, 11, 20, 28), and the fact that lead and cadmium levels tend to have positive correlations with each other. A study of rural school children without acute exposures and with IQs in the normal range found highly significant relations between lead and cadmium with intelligence scores and school achievement tests (12). Lead and cadmium explained 29% of the variance in IQ. These two metals have been found to have different mechanisms of CNS damage, with cadmium affecting verbal ability more and lead affecting performance measures more. The author of another study (28) of 9 year olds living in an area near an incinerator in Ohio concluded that part of the developmental effects attributed to lead in many past studies was mostly due to cadmium effects, with lead serving as a marker for cadmium effects due to their common origins and cadmium’s effect of increasing lead accumulation. The findings of this study were generally consistent with a previous study (12) regarding higher levels of cadmium and lower levels of zinc in children with cognitive deficits. However, this study found zinc levels, though significantly affected, can be increased in some depending on other factors. Cadmium, as previously noted, as well as mercury, has anti metabolite effects that significantly affect calcium, zinc, and phosphate levels in the body (74, 28, 43). The reduction in zinc levels causes increased absorption of lead, and cadmium’s effect on the pyrimdine-5-nucleotidase enzyme inhibits phosphorylation in the energy/respiratory ATP function (28). This study found the level of hair phosphorous, as affected by cadmium exposure, was the best indicator of cognitive function and dysfunction. Lead was found to have a lesser effect on phosphorous level and ATP function. The entire group of learning disabled boys had low hair phosphorous levels compared to those without learning disabilities. The main factors appearing to affect those with high cadmium levels and low phosphorous hair levels were living within 2 miles of the incinerator, exposure to passive cigarette smoke, and living in a rural area that may have had high cadmium levels in wells. Another study found heavy smokers have cadmium levels in body tissues about 2 times that of non smokers, and hair cadmium levels in newborns of smokers were twice as great as in newborns of non smokers (53).

Other studies have found that cadmium causes significant decreases in birth weight through its anti metabolite actions (53, 54) and significant increases in blood pressure (55). Newborn hair cadmium levels have been found to be significantly correlated to maternal hair levels and mothers exposed occupationally to heavy metals to have hair levels twice as high as controls (54). Likewise, adults with higher than average cadmium levels performed less well on measures of attention, psychomotor speed, and memory (56).

These toxic metals have also been found to have significant effects on motor-visual ability and performance (6a, 8, 19, 20, 43), as measured by the Bender Visual-Motor Gestalt Test score. Arsenic, lead, and cadmium levels had the highest correlation with cognitive scores, while aluminum had a significant relation mostly with motor-visual performance, and mercury had lesser but highly significant correlations to both.

Studies have also found evidence of a connection between low levels of zinc and three other common childhood diseases: treatment resistant depression (70), childhood-onset diabetes (72), and epilepsy (73). Zinc is an antagonist to toxic metals like cadmium and mercury, and adequate levels are required to balance the adverse effects of these toxic metals on cellular calcium and other enzymatic processes (28, 74). Other connections between mercury and type 1 diabetes have also been demonstrated. Mercury has been found to cause an increase in inflammatory

Th2 cytokines (116). In the pancreas, the cells responsible for insulin production can be damaged or destroyed by the chronic high levels of cytokines, with the potential of inducing type II diabetes—even in otherwise healthy individuals with no other risk factors for diabetes (117). Mercury inhibits production of insulin and is a factor in diabetes and hypoglycemia, with significant reductions in insulin need after replacement of amalgam fillings and normalizing of blood sugar (109). A connection between mercury in vaccines and epilepsy has also been found (118).

It should be noted that both blood and hair mercury levels have been found to not be highly correlated to exposure from mercury vapor, which is the most common exposure from mercury, because of special properties of mercury (43). Mercury vapor has an extremely short half life in blood, and rapidly crosses cell membranes in body organs where it is oxidized to inorganic mercury, accumulating in the brain, heart, kidneys, and other locations. Thus, although elemental mercury exposures are typically greater than organic exposures, most mercury in the blood is organic. Likewise, hair mercury has been shown to be more highly correlated with organic mercury exposure than with inorganic (43). Hair tests are affected by external mercury exposure in occupational exposures such as dental offices which typically have fairly high levels of mercury. Other measures of mercury such as stool, saliva, and urine have been found to be better measures of mercury for such cases. Urine contains mostly inorganic mercury, but becomes less reliable with long term chronic exposure due to cumulative damage to the urinary detox system. Urinary fractionated porphyrin test is a good test of metabolic damage that has occurred due to mercury and other toxics. The level and distribution of the 6 porphyrins measured indicates extent of damage as well as likely source of damage (43).

Hair levels have been found to be generally reliable indicators of recent environmental metal exposures other than mercury (28, 52, 54, 58), and to be better correlated with symptoms than blood tests (88). Similarly, blood levels have been found to not reflect chronic or historic cadmium exposure (52, 53, 58) since metals such as cadmium and mercury have extremely short half life in the blood but long half life in the body. Air measurements of cadmium or mercury tend to be very unreliable due to the small particle size, dispersion variation, and other factors. Measure of accumulation in area plants is one reasonably reliable method; areas with cadmium levels over 0.5 ppm indicate significant air pollution.

IV. Sources of Exposure to Toxic Metals

The studies reviewed suggest that exposure to toxic metals may account for over 20% of learning disabilities, 20% of all strokes and heart attacks, and in some areas be a factor in over 40% of all birth defects (43, 87, etc.). The U.S. Center for Disease Control has found that primary exposure to lead is from soil, paint chips, drinking water, fertilizer, food, auto and industrial emissions, ammunition (shot and bullets), bathtubs (cast iron, porcelain, steel), batteries, canned foods, ceramics, chemical fertilizers, cosmetics, dolomite, dust, foods grown around industrial areas, gasoline, hair dyes and rinses, leaded glass, newsprint and colored advertisements, paints, pesticides, pewter, pottery, rubber toys, soft coal, soil, solder, baby formula using tap water, tobacco smoke, vinyl ‘mini-blinds’, and dust (35,108). High levels of cadmium are found in regions with high emissions from incinerators, coal plants, or cars (28), as well as in shellfish (36), art supplies, bone meal and cigarette smoke (28). Other common sources include rural drinking water wells (28, 35), processed food, fertilizer, and old paint, food (coffee, fruits, grains, and vegetables grown in cadmium-laden soil, meats [kidneys, liver, poultry], or refined foods), freshwater fish, fungicides, highway dusts, incinerators, mining, nickel-cadmium batteries, oxide dusts, paints, phosphate fertilizers, power plants, seafood (crab, flounder, mussels, oysters, scallops), sewage sludge, “softened” water, smelting plants, tobacco and tobacco smoke, and welding fumes.

Common exposures to aluminum include aluminum cookware, antiperspirants, antacids, processed cheese and other processed food, lipstick, medications and drugs (anti-diarrheal agents, hemorrhoid medications, and vaginal douches),”softened” water, and tap water. Common sources of arsenic include antibiotics given to commercial livestock, air pollution, chemical processing, coal-fired power plants, defoliants, drinking water, drying agents for cotton, fish and shellfish, herbicides, insecticides, meats (from commercially raised poultry and cattle), metal ore smelting, pesticides, seafood (fish, mussels, oysters), specialty glass, and wood preservatives. Nickel, which is highly toxic and commonly causes immune reactions, is commonly seen in dental crowns and braces, along with jewelry, etc. (nickel and inorganic mercury commonly produce allergic type autoimmune problems (29)). Manganese and other metal exposure can come through welding or metal work. Cadmium, mercury, arsenic, chromium, silver, copper, and are other metals to which Floridians and others are commonly exposed in drinking water, food, or dental materials (34-36).

The most common significant exposure for most people is to mercury vapor from amalgam fillings (43). Most people with several amalgam fillings have daily exposure exceeding the U.S. government health guideline for mercury (4, 43). Likewise, a major exposure source of infants and young children is from placental transfer from their mother’s amalgam fillings and breast feeding (43, 101, 107). The average amalgam filling has more than ½ gram of mercury, and has been documented to continuously leak mercury into the body of those with amalgam fillings due to the low mercury vapor pressure and galvanic current induced by mixed metals in the mouth. Because of the extreme toxicity of mercury, only ½ gram is required to contaminate the ecosystem and fish of a 10 acre lake to the extent that a health warning would be issued by the government to not eat the fish (43); over 50,000 such warnings for 20% of U.S. lakes (1) and 7% of all U.S. river miles. All Great Lakes as well as many coastal bays and estuaries and large numbers of salt water fish carry similar health warnings.

Mercury is one of the most toxic substances commonly encountered, and according to Government agencies, causes adverse health effects in large numbers of people in the U.S. (1, 2, 43). Based on widespread tests, the U.S. CDC estimates that approx. 10% of women of childbearing age, 6 million women, have current mercury levels that would put fetuses at risk of developmental neurological problems (1), without considering other common sources of mercury in infants. The extreme toxicity of mercury can be seen from documented effects on wildlife by very low levels of mercury exposure. The amount of mercury in the marine environment is increasing 4.8% per year, doubling every 16 years (1). Some Florida panthers that eat birds and animals that eat fish containing very low levels of mercury (about 1 part per million) have died from chronic mercury poisoning (43). Since mercury is an estrogenic chemical and reproductive toxin, the majority of the rest cannot reproduce. The average male Florida panther has higher estrogen levels than females, due to the estrogenic properties of mercury. Similar is true of some other animals at the top of the food chain like polar bears, beluga and orca whales, and alligators, which are affected by mercury and other hormone disrupting chemicals.

Another major exposure source to infants is from thimerosal used in vaccinations as a preservative. The majority of infants get exposure above Government health guidelines for mercury and large numbers of infants with related neurological problems such as autism and ADD have been documented (81). A major source of phenyl mercury is from mercury in paint, where many have been exposed to dangerous levels (106). The major source of exposure to organic (methyl) mercury is from fish and shellfish, but inorganic mercury has also been found to be methylated in the body by bacteria, yeast, etc. (43). Significant levels of various forms of organic mercury have also been documented from dental work such as root canals and gold crowns over amalgam base (43, 29). Methylmercury has been documented to be among the most potent developmental neurotoxicants (66, 101, 107), with evidence over 60,000 children are born each year with neurodevelopmental impairment due to prenatal exposure. Mercury vapor is the form that most readily crosses cellular membranes including the blood-brain barrier and placenta of pregnant women, and results in the highest levels in the major organs such as the brain, heart, and kidneys for a given level of exposure. But the average half-life of vapor in the blood is only seconds so blood tests are not a good measure of such exposure. For similar reasons, hair mercury is a less accurate measure of body inorganic mercury burden than for the other metals. Both mercury vapor and organic mercury have been found to be highly toxic and to have independent and synergistic effects at very low levels (43, 101, 107). However, developmental effects have been found at comparable or lower levels from mercury vapor than from organic or inorganic exposure (43), and it has been well established that the primary exposure for most people other than kids’ exposure to mercury from vaccines is from mercury vapor (43).

V. Measures to Reduce or Alleviate Toxic Metal Toxicity

The most important measure to alleviate effects of toxic metals is avoidance of exposure or reducing current exposures. Current exposure levels of most common metals can be tested by a stool test kit from a lab such as Doctors Data Lab or Great Smokies Diagnostic Lab, and recent exposures can be tested somewhat easier and cheaper by hair tests (see 66). Research information on common causes of chronic conditions and treatment information can be found on the Great Smokies Diagnostic Lab web site (66).

As noted previously, most infants get exposure to mercury beyond the federal government health guideline from mercury thimerosal used as a preservative in vaccinations (81). Since all vaccinations are now available mercury free, parents should request the mercury free version. Significant levels are also received through placental transfer and breast feeding by mothers exposed to mercury through amalgam dental fillings or eating fish (30-32, 43). Over 70% of mercury in the blood is commonly organic mercury, while the majority in the kidneys and urine is inorganic. The majority of exposure from amalgam is to vapor which is rapidly transmitted to cells throughout the body in blood and transformed to inorganic mercury in cells. There is common conversion in the body between organic and inorganic mercury through methylation and demethylation processes (43), so type of mercury in the body does not indicate the original source of mercury.

For children with developmental or neurological conditions, a hair test can be used to assess toxicity effects (note that toxic metals affect cellular mineral levels so a large number of mineral level abnormalities can indicate toxicity effects). High levels of metals can be reduced by avoidance, use of mineral antagonists, oral chelators, and chemical chelation (66). Likewise, the majority of those with amalgam fillings have significant daily exposures often exceeding government health standards for mercury (43). Daily inorganic mercury exposure can be assessed by stool or saliva test or mouth oral air measurement, but since many have been tested, several studies have developed analytical equations to estimate daily exposure based on number of amalgam surfaces in the mouth, which give reasonable estimates. The main way to reduce mercury exposure to elemental mercury is to avoid amalgam fillings and/or replace amalgam fillings with other materials. Other materials are available that perform as well as amalgam.

Seafood and fish have often been found to have high levels of organic mercury, cadmium, and arsenic. For those eating significant amounts of such, the levels in the diet can be monitored by direct food testing or stool test for current exposure levels, or by hair or blood test. Fish and seafood from areas known to contain high levels of toxic metals should be eaten only occasionally if at all, depending on levels. Those who eat a lot of freshwater fish or seafood often have levels of mercury or some other metal exceeding government guidelines. Hair tests offer a reasonable reliable low cost method of assessing the level of many toxic metals in one test. Aluminum exposures can be reduced by avoiding aluminum antiperspirants, food cooked in aluminum cookware, and foods such as processed cheese that have high levels of aluminum.

As previously noted, one of the main mechanisms of toxic effects is generation of free radicals and oxidative damage (66). This can be partially alleviated by eating foods high in antioxidants or supplementation of vitamins A, C, and E, along with supplements such as grapeseed extract, pinebark extract, bilberry, etc. Bioflavonoids like bilberry and other fruits have been found to improve the function of the blood brain barrier. Vitamin C provides protection against toxicity of inorganic mercury by reducing the more toxic Hg2+ form to the less toxic Hg+ form of mercury. Vitamin B complex is also important to alleviate neurological effects. Most toxic metals also have mineral antagonists known to counteract toxic effects. For example, selenium and zinc are antagonists of mercury, while zinc and iron are antagonists of cadmium (5, 64, 65, 74, 123). Iron and zinc deficiencies, which can be caused by exposure to toxic metals, increase metal toxicities and supplementation can reduce toxicities, but they can also be toxic if levels are too high. Likewise calcium and magnesium deficiencies and imbalances have been seen to be caused by toxic metals, and proper supplementation can reduce toxicities and reverse conditions caused by these deficiencies or imbalances. Several studies have found that most children with ADHD have deficiencies of certain minerals that are commonly depleted by exposure to toxic metals, such as magnesium and zinc, and most show significant improvement after supplementation with these minerals (67-71, 83, 88). Magnesium is the most common significant mineral deficiency among ADHD children (67-69), but zinc is commonly deficient among children with ADHD and disruptive behavior disorder (68, 83, 19). Studies have found the level of free fatty acids also significantly lower in children with ADHD (70, 83, 19), and some practitioners recommend supplementation of essential fatty acids as well in treatment of ADHD. Large studies in schools in New York have found that dietary improvements and supplementation leads to large improvements in cognitive scores and large reductions in learning-disabled children (120).

Whey protein and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) can increase levels of glutathione, which is necessary for detoxification and is depleted by toxic metals as previously noted (66). However, care must also be exercised regarding proper level if these are supplemented, starting with low levels. Ensuring adequate calcium intake can reduce the toxic effects of lead (66). Chelation with chemical chelators such as DMSA can also greatly reduce metal body burden, but should only be considered with advice of a knowledgeable physician. DMSA (or EDTA) are effective for lead detoxification, but DMSA is also effective for mercury and other toxic metals. Studies have found that use of EDTA by patients with high levels of mercury can cause serious side effects, so EDTA should be used only when mercury levels have been found to be low (43). DMPS is the most effective chelator for mercury body burden, but there have been some adverse effects that may be related to improper protocols. NAC, which can be obtained from most health food stores or catalogs, chelates mercury and arsenic but at a slower rate than the prescriptive chelators. Large numbers of children with ADD, autism, and other forms of learning disabilities have shown significant improvement after chelation and nutritional supplementation for deficiencies (23, 43, 81d, 99, 130, etc.) In most such clinics treating these conditions, the majority improved after treatment.

References

(1) ATSDR/EPA Priority List for 1999: Top 20 Hazardous Substances, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/99list.html; & United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, November 2000, The National Listing of Fish and Wildlife Advisories: Summary of 1999 Data, EPA-823-F-00-20, http://www.epa.gov/ost/fish/advisories/general.html; & Toxicological Effects of Methylmercury (2000), pp. 304-332: Risk Characterization and Public Health Implications, Nat’l Academy Press, 2000, www.nap.edu; & U.S. Centers for Disease Control, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Mar 2, 2001, www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5008a2.html.

(2) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Hazardous Air Pollutant Hazard Summary Fact Sheets, EPA: In Risk Information System, 1995; & EPA spokesman, U.S. News & World Report, “In the Air That They Breathe”, Science & News, 12-20-99; & U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1996, Integrated Risk Information System, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Cincinnati, Ohio (& web page); & EPA spokesman, U.S. News & World Report, “Kids at Risk” (cover story), 6-19-2000.

(3) J.O. Nriagu, “Global metal pollution—Poisoning the biosphere”, Environment,

Vol. 32, No. 7, Sept. 1990; & Shukla GS, Singhal RL, “The present status of biological effects of toxic metals in the environment: lead, cadmium, and manganese”, Can J Physiol Pharmacol, 1984 Aug, 62(8):1015-31; & Science News, Nov 6, 1986, P327-.

(4) Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, U.S. Public Health Service, “Toxicological Profile for Mercury”, March 1999; & Apr 19, 1999 Media Advisory, New MRLs for toxic substances, MRL: elemental mercury vapor/inhalation/chronic & MRL: methyl mercury/oral/acute; & http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/mrls.html.

(5) Goyer RA, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, “Toxic and essential metal interactions”, Annu Rev Nutr, 1997, 17:37-50; & “Nutrition and metal toxicity”, Am J Clin Nutr, 1995, 61(Suppl 3):646S-650S; & Goyer RA, et al., “Environmental risk factors for osteoporosis”, Envir Health Perspectives, 1994, 102(4):390-394.

(6) Marlowe M, Cossairt A, Moon C, Errera J, “Main and interactive effects of metallic toxins on classroom behavior”, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1985, 13(2):185-98.

(6a) Marlowe M, Stellern J, Errera J, Moon C, “Main and interactive effects of metal pollutants on visual-motor performance”, Arch Environ Health, 1985, 40(4):221-5.

(7) Pihl RO, Parkes M, “Hair element content in learning disabled children”, Science, 1977 Oct 14, 198(4313):204-6.

(8) Moon C, Marlowe M, Stellem J, Errera J, “Main and interactive effects of metallic pollutants on cognitive functioning”, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1985, 18(4):217-221.

(9) Lewis M, Worobey J, Ramsay DS, McCormack MK, “Prenatal exposure to heavy metals: effect on childhood cognitive skills and health status”, Pediatrics, 1992, 89(6 Pt 1):1010-15.

(10) Capel ID, Pinnock MH, Dorrell HM, Williams DC, Grant EC, “Comparison of concentrations of some trace, bulk, and toxic metals in the hair of normal and dyslexic children”, Clin Chem, 1981 Jun, 27(6):879-81; & Frith CD, et al., “Dyslexia more common in English speaking countries”, Science, Mar 2001.

(11) Marlowe M, Errera J, Jacobs J, “Increased lead and cadmium burdens among mentally retarded children and children with borderline intelligence”, Am J Ment Defic, 1983 Mar, 87(5):477-83; & Journal of Special Education, 1982, 16:87-99.

(12)Thatcher RW, Lester ML, McAlaster R, Horst R, “Effects of low levels of cadmium and lead on cognitive functioning in children”, Arch Environ Health, 1982 May-Jun, 37(3):159-66.

(13) Marlowe M, Errera J, Cossairt A, Welch K, “Hair mineral content as a predictor of learning disabilities”, Journal of Learning Disabilites, 1985.

(14) Marlowe M, Errera J, Jacobs J, “Increased lead and mercury levels in emotionally disturbed children”, Journal of Orthomolecular Psychiatry, 1983, 12:260-267; & Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1983, 93:386-9.

(15) Marlowe M, Moon C, Errera J, Jacobs J, “Levels and combinations of metallic toxins and measures of behavioral disturbance, in: Rutherford RB (Ed.), Monographs in Behavior Disorders, Vol. 5, p76-85, Council for Children and Behavior Disorders, Reston Va; & Chisolm J, “Toxicity from heavy metal interactions and behavioral effects”, Pediatrics, 1974, 53:841-43.

(16) Wecker L, Miller SB, Cochran SR, Dugger DL, Johnson WD, “Trace element concentrations in hair from autistic children”, Defic Res, 1985, 29(Pt 1):15-22; & Zhai ST, “Trace element measurement in patients with schizophrenia”, Chung Hua Shen Ching Shen Ko Tsa Chih, 1990, 23(6):332-8, 383.

(17) Rimland B, Larson GE, “Hair mineral analysis and behavior: An analysis of 51 studies”, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1983, 16:279-85.

(18) Jiang HM, Han GA, He ZL, “Clinical significance of hair cadmium content in the diagnosis of mental retardation of children”, Chin Med J (Engl), 1990 Apr, 103(4):331-4.

(19) Great Smokies Diagnostic Lab, Developmental Disorders of Toxic Origin: The

Persistence of Lead, 2000, http://www.gsdl.com/news/insights/number4/index1.html; & Emory E, Pattillo R, Archibold E, Bayorh M, Sung F, “Neurobehavioral effects of low-level lead exposure in human neonates”, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1999, 181:S2-11; & Mendelsohn AL, Dreyer BP, et al., “Low-level lead exposure and behavior in early childhood”, Pediatrics, 1998, 101(3):E10.

(20) Bonithon-Kopp C, Huel G, Moreau T, Wendling R, “Prenatal exposure to lead and cadmium and psychomotor development of the child at 6 years”, Neurolbehav Toxicol Teratol, 1986, 8(3):307-10.

(20a) David OJ, Hoffman SP, Sverd J, Clark K, Am J Psychiatry, 1976, 133:1155; &

Perino J, Ernhart CB, Proc Annu Conv Am Psychol Assoc, 1973, 81:719; & Leviton A,

Bellinger D, Allred EN, “Pre- and postnatal low-level lead exposure and children’s dysfunction in school”, Environ Res, 1993, 60(1):30-43; & Eppright TD, Samfacon JA, and Horwitz EA, “ADHD, infantile autism, and elevated blood level: a possible relationship”, Mo Med, 1996, 93(3):136-8; & Brockel BJ, Cory-Slechta DA, “Lead, attention, and impulsive behavior”, Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 1998, 60(2):545-52; & Bellinger D, et al., “Attentional correlates of dentin levels in adolescents, Arch Environ Health, 1994, 49(2):8-105.

(20b) Deborah C. Rice, “Parallels between Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and behavioral deficits produced by neurotoxic exposure in monkeys”, Environmental Health Perspectives, Volume 108, Supplement 3, June 2000.

(21) Needleman HL, Riess JA, Tobin MJ, Biesecker GE, Greenhouse JB, “Bone lead levels and delinquent behavior”, JAMA, 1996, 275(5):363-9; & Needleman HL, Schell A, Bellinger D, Leviton A, Allred En, “The long-term effects of exposure to low dose of lead in childhood”, N. England J Med, 1990, 322:83-88; & Needleman HL, Leviton A, Reed R, “Deficits in psychologic and classroom performance of children with elevated dentine lead levels”, New Eng J Med, 1979, 300:689-95; & Burns ghurst PA, Sawyer MG, McMichael Am, Ton SL, “Lifetime low-level lead exposure to environmental lead and children’s emotional and behavioral development at ages 11-13”, Am J Epidemiology, 1999, 149(8):740-49.

(22) Winneke G, Kramer U, et al., “Neuropsychological studies in children with elevated tooth lead”, International Archives of Occupational Environmental Health, 1983, 51:231-252; & de la Burde B, Dhoate M, “Early asymptomatic lead exposure and development at school age”, Journal of Pediatrics, 1975, 87:638-642.

(23) Nancy Hallaway, Zigurts Strauts, Turning Lead into Gold : How Heavy Metal Poisoning Can Affect Your Child and How to Prevent and Treat It, 1995; & Dr. Bruce Lanphear, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Annual Meeting of the Pediatric Academic Societies, Baltimore, April, 2001, http://enquirer.com/editions/2001/05/01/loc_even_little_lead.html.

(24) Albert RE, Shore RE, Sayers AJ, et al., Environmental Health Perspectives, 1974, 7:33-40; & Annau Z, Cuomo V, “Mechanisms of neurotoxicity and their relationship to behavioral changes”, Toxicology, 1988, 49(2-3):219-25.

(25) Needleman HL, “Behavioral toxicology”, Environ Health Perspect, 1995, 103(Supp6):77-79; & USPHS (ATSDR), Toxicological profile for lead, 1997, U.S. Public Health Service, CDROM.

(26) Abadin HG, Hibbs BF, Pohl HR, U.S. Department of Health, Division of Toxicology, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, “Breast-feeding exposure of infants to cadmium, lead, and mercury: a public health viewpoint”, Toxicol Ind Health, 1997, 13(4):495-517.

(27) Boadi WY, Urbach J, Branes JM, Yannai S, “In vitro exposure to mercury and cadmium alters term human placental membrane fluidity”, Pharmacol, 1992, 116(1):17-23.

(28) Stewart-Pinkham, SM, “The effect of ambient cadmium air pollution on the hair mineral content of children”, The Science of the Total Environment, 1989, 78:289-96.

(29) Stejskal VDM, Danersund A, Lindvall A, Hudecek R, Nordman V, Yaqob A, et al., “Metal-specific memory lymphocytes: biomarkers of sensitivity in man”, Neuroendocrinology Letters, 1999; & L. Tibbling, Stejskal VDM, et al., “Immunological and brain MRI changes in patients with suspected metal intoxication”, Int J Occup Med Toxicol, 1995, 4(2):285-294; & “Mercury-specific

lymphocytes: an indication of mercury allergy in man”, J. Clinical Immunology, 1996, 16(1);31-40; & V.D.M. Stejskal, et al., “MELISA: tool for the study of metal allergy”, Toxicology in Vitro, 8(5):991-1000, 1994, see: http://www.melisa.org.

(30) T.W. Clarkson, et al., “Reproductive and developmental toxicity of metals”, Scandinavian J. of Work & Environmental Health, 1985, 11:145-154: & Anderson HA, Wolff MS, “Environmental contaminants in human milk”, J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol, 2000 Nov-Dec, 10(6 Pt 2):755-60.

(31) Lutz E, Lind B, Herin P, Krakau I, Bui TH, Vahter M, “Concentrations of mercury, cadmium, and lead in brain and kidney of second trimester fetuses and infants”, Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, 1996, 10: 61-67; & G. Drasch, et al., “Mercury burden of human fetal and infant tissues”, Eur J Pediatr, 1994, 153:607-610; & A. Oskarsson, et al., “Mercury in breast milk in relation to fish consumption and amalgam”, Arch environ Health, 1996, 51(3):234-41; & Drasch, et al., “Mercury in human colostrum and early breast milk”, J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol., 1998, 12:23-27.

(32) Vahter M, Akesson A, Lind B, Bjors U, Schutz A, Berglund M, “Longitudinal study of methylmercury and inorganic mercury in blood and urine of pregnant and lactating women, as well as in umbilical cord blood”, Environ Res, 2000 Oct, 84(2):186-94.

(33) T. Colburn, et al., “Developmental effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in wildlife and humans”, Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 101(5), Oct 93; & “Mercury found in dead Florida Bay cormorants”, Tallahassee Democrat, 1-15-95; & “Are environmental hormones emasculating wildlife?”, Science News, 1994, 145:25-27; & C.F. Facemire, et al., “Reproductive impairment in the Florida panther”, Health Perspect, 1995, 103(Supp4):79-86; & I. Gerhard, et al., “The limits of hormone substitution in pollutant exposure and fertility disorders”, Zentralbl

Gynakol, 1992, 114:593-602.

(34) “Cadmium Hazards to Fish, Wildlife, and Invertebrates”, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Contamination Hazard Biological Report 85(1.2), 1987; & “Mercury bioaccumulation in lake ecosystems”, Electric Power Research Inst. EPRI Journal, December 1994, p5; & Bender MT and Williams JM, Public Health Report

Submitted by Dad on Thu, 02/10/2005 - 7:12 PM

Permalink

(35) Birth Defects Prevention News, March 1986, p3.

(36) Florida Dept. of Environmental Protection, Florida Coastal Sediment

Contaminants Atlas: A Summary of Coastal Sediment Quality Surveys, 1994; &

Mac Donald Environmental Sciences Ltd., Development of an Approach to the

Assessment of Sediment Quality in Florida Coastal Waters,FDEP,January 1993; &

J.H.Trefry et al, Marine & Environmental Chemistry Laboratories, Fla.

Institue of Technology, Toxic Substances Survey for the Indian River Lagoon System, Volume I: Trace Metals in the Indian River Lagoon, SJWMD, Feb 1993; &

D.C.Heil, Fla. Dept. of Natural Resources, Division of Marine Resources,

Evaluation of Trace Metal Monitoring in Florida Shellfish, March 1986; &

U.S. EPA, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program, Estuaries:

Louisianian Province-1992 & 1991.

(37) H.R. Casdorph, Toxic Metal Syndrome, Avery Publishing Group, 1995 & S.E. Levick, Yale Univ. School of Medicine, New England Journal of Medicine; July 17, 1980.

(38) Atchison WD. Effects of neurotoxicants on synaptic transmission: lessons learned from electrophysiological studies. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1988 Sep-Oct;10(5):393-416.

(39) Stohs SJ, Bagchi D. Oxidative mechanisms in the toxicity of metal ions. Free Radic Biol Med 1995 Feb;18(2):321-36.

(40) Lopez-Ortal P, Souza V, Bucio L, Gonzalez E, Gutierrez-Ruiz M. DNA damage produced by cadmium in human fetal hepatic cell line. Mutat Res 1999 Feb 19;439(2):301-6.

(41) Rodier P.M. Developing brain as a target of toxicity. Environ Health Perspect 1995; 103(Supp 6): 73-76.

(42) Rice, D.C., Issues in developmental neurotoxicology: interpretation and implications of the data. Can J Public Health 1998; 89(Supp1): S31-40.

(43) B. Windham, Annotated Bibliography: Health Effects Related to Mercury from Amalgam Fillings and Documented Clinical Results of Replacement of Amalgam Fillings” 1999.

(over 600 references)

(44) Webb M. Cadmium. Br Med Bull 1975, 31: 246-50; & Singhal RL, Merali Z. Aspects of the biochemical toxicity of cadmium. Biochem Aspec Toxic Agents 1979, 35: 75-80; & Underwood EJ. Trace Elements in Nutrition. 1977, Academic Press, NY, NY.

(45) Stowe HD, Wilson M, Goyer RA. Arch Pathol 1972, 94: 389; & Sutherland DB, Robinson GA. Diabetes 1969, 18:797.

(46) Spivey-Fox MR. Nutritional influences on metal toxicity. Environ Health Perspect 1979; 29: 95-104.

(47) Hernberg S; & Moore MR. in Lead Toxicity, R.Singhal & J.Thomas(eds), Urban & Schwarzenberg, Inc. Baltimore, 1980; & Govani S, Memo M. “Chronic lead treatment differentially affects dopamine synthesis”, Toxicology 1979, 12:343-49; & Scheuhammer AM. Cherian MG. Effects of heavy metal cations and sulfhydyl reagents on striatal D2 dopamine receptors. Biochem Pharmacol 1985, 34(19):3405-13..

(48) Pfeiffer CC, Iliev V. A study of copper excess and zinc deficiency in schizophrenia. in: International Review of Neurobiology, Supplement 1, Academic Press, NY,NY, 1972, p141-164;& Alexander PE, Van Kammen DP. Serum magnesium and calcium levels in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1979; 36: 1372-77.

(49) Bowdler NC, Beasley DS. Behavioral effects of aluminum ingestion. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1979; 10: 505-512; & Trapp GA, Miner GD. Aluminum levels in brain in Alzheimer’s Disease. Biol Psychiatry 1978; 13: 709-718.

Dietrich KN, Berger OG, Succop PA. The developmental consequences of low to moderate postnatal lead exposure. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1993; 15(1): 37-44.

(51) Tong S, Baghurst P, McMichael A, Sawyer M. Lifetime exposure to lead and children’s intelligence at 11-13 years: Port Pirie cohort study. BMJ 1996; 312(7046): 1569-75.

(52) Moon J, et al. Science of the Total Environment 1986; 54: 107-25.

(53) Frery N, et al, Validity of Hair Cadmium in detescting chronic cadmium exposure in general populations. Bulletin of Environ Contamination 1993; 501:736-43; & Frery N, et al, Environmental exposure to cadmium and human birthweight. Toxicology 1993; 79(2): 109-18.

(54) Huel G, et al, Cadmium and lead content of maternal and newborn hair: relationship to partiy, birth, and hypertension. Arch Environ Health 1981; 36(5): 221-7; & Huel G, et al, Increased hair cadmium in hair of newborns of women occupationally exposed to heavy metals. Environ Res 1984; 35(1): 115-21.

(55) Bergomi M, et al, Blood, teeth, and hair: evaluation of exposure to lead and cadmium in children living in an industrial zone. Ann Ig 1989; 1(5): 1185-96; & Vivoli G, et al, Cadmium in blood, urine, and hair related to human hypertension. J Trace Elem Electrolytes Health Dis 1989;3(3):139-45.

(56) Hart RP, et al, Neuropsychological effects of occupational exposure to cadmium. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1989; 11(6):933-43.

(57) Petit TL, et al, Early lead exposure and the hippocampus. Neurotoxicology 1983; 4(1):

74-79.

(58) Raghunath R, et al, Retention times of Pb, Cd, and Zn in children’s blood. Sci Total Environ 1997; 207(2-3):133-9; & Zhuang GS; Wang YS; Tan MG; Zhi M; Pan WQ;Cheng YD. Preliminary study of the distribution of the toxic elements As, Cd, and Hg in human hair and tissues by NAA. Biol Trace Elem Res 1990 Jul-Dec;26-27:729-36.

(59) Nielsen FH, et al, Nickel deficiency in rats. J Nutr 1975; 105(12):1620-30; & Smith SA, et al, Elevated serum nickel concentration in psoriasis vulgaris. In J Dermatol 1994. 33(11): 783-5.

(60) Hu H. Knowledge of diagnosis and reproductive history among survivors of childhood plumbism. Am J Public Health 1991; 81*8): 1070-2; & Lutz PM, et al, Elevated immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels in children with exposure to environmental lead. Toxicology 1999; 134(1): 63-78.

(61) Gottschalk LA, et al, Abnormalities in hair trace elements as indicatores of aberrant behavior. Compr Psychiatry 1991; 32(3): 229-37.

(62) Schauss A.G. Comparative hair mineral analysis in a randomly selected “normal” population and violent criminal offenders. Int J Biosocial Res 1981; 1:21-41.

(63) Cromwell P.F. et al, Hair mineral analysis: biochemical imbalances and violent criminal behavior. Psychol Rep 1989; 64:259-66.

(64) Fox MR, Jacobs Rm, Jones AO, Fry Be Jr, Stone CL. Effects of Citamin C and Iron on cadmium metabolism. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1980; 355: 249-61.

(65) Geertz R, Gulyas H Gercken G. Cytotoxicity of dust constituents to alveolar machrophages: interations of heavy metal compounds. Toxicoloty 1994; 86(1-2):13-27.

(66) Quig D. Cysteine metabolism and metal toxicity. Doctor’s Data, Inc., West Chicago, IL, USA. [email protected] Altern Med Rev, 1998 Aug, 3:4, 262-70

(67) Kozielec T, Starobrat-Hermelin B. Assessment of magnesium levels in children with ADHD. Magnes Res 1997; 10(2):143-8.

(68) Starobrat-Hermelin B. The effect of deficiency of selected bioelements on hyperactvity in children with certain specified mental disorders. Ann Acad Med Stetin 1998; 44:297-314. [article in Polish]

(69) Starobrat-Hermelin B, Kozielec T. The effects of magnesium physiological supplementation on hyperactivity in children with ADHD: positive response to magnesium oral loading test. Magnes Res 1997. 10(2):149-56.

(70) Bekaroglu M, Aslan Y, Gedik Y, Karahan C. Relationships between serum free fatty acids and zinc with ADHD. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1996; 37(2):225-7.

(71) Arnold LE, Votolato NA, Kleykamp D, Baker GB, Bornstein RA. Does hair zinc predict treatment improvement of ADHD? Int J Neurosci 1990; 50(1-2): 103-7.

(72) Haglund B, Ryckenberg K, Selinus O, Dahlquist G. Evidence of a relationship between childhood-onset diabtes and low groundwater concentration of zinc. Diabetes Care 1996; 19(8): 873-5.

(73) Shrestha KP; Oswaldo A. Trace elements in hair of epileptic and normal subjects.

Sci Total Environ 1987 Dec;67(2-3):215-25.

(74) Smith JB; Dwyer SD; Smith L. Cadmium evokes inositol polyphosphate formation and calcium mobilization. Evidence for a cell surface receptor that cadmium stimulates and zinc antagonizes. J Biol Chem 1989 May 5;264(13):7115-8.

(75) S.Nonaka et al, Nat. Inst. of Mental Health, Bethesda Md., “Lithium treatment protects neurons in CNS from glutamate induced excitibility and calcium influx”, Neurobiology, Vol 95(5):2642-2647, Mar 3, 1998.

(76) Schrauzer GN, Shrestha KP, Flores-Arce MF. Lithium in scalp hair of adults, students, and violent criminals. Effects of supplementation and evidence for interactions of lithium with vitamin B12 and with other trace elements. Biol Trace Elem Res 1992 Aug;34(2):161-76.

(77)Schrauzer GN, de Vroey E. Effects of nutritional lithium supplementation on mood. A

placebo-controlled study with former drug users. Biol Trace Elem Res 1994; 40(1):89-101.

(78) Schrauzer GN, Shrestha KP. Lithium in drinking water and the incidences of crimes, suicides, and arrests related to drug addictions. Biol Trace Elem Res 1990 May;25(2):105-13

(79) Sheard MH, Marini JL, Bridges CI, Wagner E. The effect of lithium on impulsive aggressive behavior in man. Am J Psychiatry 1976 Dec;133(12):1409-13

(80) California Health and Human Services Agency, Dept. Of Developmental Services, 1999;

& Autism Research Center(http://www.autism.com/ari/) and National Vaccine Information Center(http://www.909shot.com/ ).

(81) Autism: a unique form of mercury poisoning. http://www.canfoundation.org/newcansite/sciwatch/invest.html

(82) Agocs MM, Etzel RA, Parrish RG, Hesse JL. Mercury exposure from interior latex paint. N Engl J Med 1990 Oct 18;323(16):1096-101.

Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 02/10/2005 - 7:28 PM

Permalink

Dad, I have come across some preliminary data on VNS therapy and autism.

Do you know anything about it?

Submitted by Dad on Thu, 02/10/2005 - 8:33 PM

Permalink

(Forgive me for interjecting in your post, but I wanted all the references to be posted).

I have followed Windham’s work on toxic metals since I first read of his study back in ‘98 (shortly afte my boy’s initial diagnosis). He was the one who showed that the primary source of mercury pollution in FL was crematoriums. Only recently have a couple of states (I believe CA is one) have explored legislation requiring crematoriums to pull amalgam-filled teeth prior to cremating the body.

There are two points that were not brought up in this otherwise excellent paper that I feel are worth noting:

1) Windham speaks of synnergy of toxic metals (most notably mercury and lead). Boyd Haley found that when the body is exposed to both lead and mercury, the combined “kick” is about 100 times more potent than the sum of the individual risks. What Bernie doesn’t mention here is that Haley et al also found that testosterone is also a compounder for mercury, and this may go a long way to explain why specific LD’s are more common in males (dyslexia is thought to be 2:1, ADHD 3:1 and autism 4:1 male:female). Only recently have they started to study maternal testosterone levels as they correlate to later prblems like autism.

2) It is difficult to compare exposure risk for mercury (specifically) between sources of eposure. Elemental mercury (such as the vapour coming off of fillings) is absorbed at a lesser rate than organic mercury (such as methyl (in seafood) or ethyl (thimerosal)). Additionally, the method of intake makes a difference as well. When you ingest seafood containing mercury, not only is the absolute mercury content unknown (depends upon type of fish, age of fish, level of pollution in the water the fish lived in, size of portion, etc.), but only about 10% of the mercury is absorbed through the intestinal wall. Mercury vapour is absorbed at about 50% when inhaled. Thimerosal injected subcutaneously is of course absorbed at 100%.

Also, different forms of mercury are taken into the storage organs (brain, kidneys, pancreas) at different rates. Elemental mercury does not store readily in the brain because it has difficulty crossing the brain’s blood barrier, but organic forms have much easier access. Unfortunately, once in the brain, ethyl mercury is converted back into elemental form, and that makes it extremely difficult to get it back out using conventional chelation techniques.

I know that some may think I am too focused on toxic metals, but I believe that most of the credible research conducted to date supports the idea that this is a grossly misunderstood and underreported problem with children today, especially those with LD’s, MR or who are deliquents. If you have not yet done so, I urge all parents here to have their children tested and earnestly discuss chelation with their doctors, and I also urge all persons here to put as much pressure as possible upon their elected officials to find ways to reduce or eliminate those sources and to expand testing and treatment for all affected children.

Submitted by Dad on Thu, 02/10/2005 - 8:40 PM

Permalink

[quote:44892fc599=”Anonymous”]Dad, I have come across some preliminary data on VNS therapy and autism.

Do you know anything about it?[/quote]

I have seen some of the preliminaries as it relates to treating epilepsy (and BOY did I take a beating when I mentioned it on a couple of autie boards; too much negative association with electro-shock).

I am always interested in reading new studies; please start a new thread to keep this one about the toxic metals.

Submitted by Anonymous on Fri, 02/11/2005 - 1:09 AM

Permalink

Da I am not as familiar with the metal toxicity as you are. I have alos run across information on how enviromental pollution causes estrogen dominance. This can be particularly important in fetal development.

Submitted by victoria on Thu, 02/17/2005 - 6:39 AM

Permalink

Dad — I have to agree with you that chemical toxins in the environment are a huge and often unadmitted problem. No difficulties there.

But raising the voice of scientific skepticism here — a voice that *must* be raised, the *same* voice that asks the difficult questions anout heavy metals and drug side effects and long-lasting organic toxins in the water table etc. —

I only skimmed this article, but got enough of it to raise an eyebrow pretty far:

Who is the author?
What are his qualifications in the field of toxicology or science in general?
Where was this article published, and is it a peer-reviewed and well respected journal?

There are a couple of numbers in this article that are questionable on basic statistical grounds, near impossiblilty.
The author’s style is inconsistent; at one point he is throwing around all the jargon wth fine abandon, and the next minute he is writing casually like an internet post.
The bibliography contains some very reputable journals, and a lot of things few people have ever heard of.
All of the above add up to probably an amateur collecting this data for personal reasons. Amateurs can be right — modern technology is based on electricity developed in many ways by amateurs — but such papers need to be scrutinized with the greatest of care and caution and a skeptical eye.
Unless a person had very profound knowledge of a field, it is often too easy to put two and two together and get five

Again, I *agree* with you about the dangers that have been allowed to build up in the environment. Just saying that bad statistical support can be worse than none, losing credibility for your point.

Back to Top