Skip to main content

Great info. re WISC, meaning, interpretation and more

Submitted by an LD OnLine user on

Just stumbled across this and wanted to share it. I found it particuarly helpful since my son’s subtest scores don’t fit any one type of LD, so accomodations suggested by LD don’t always make sense for him. Enjoy!

http://www.patoss-dyslexia.org/epreports.htm

Submitted by Anonymous on Fri, 05/10/2002 - 9:01 PM

Permalink

This is interesting; it is a British site and the labels on the IQ scores don’t exactly go with what is used in the US. Here, average IQ is 90-110, high average is 110-120, superior is 120-130, and 130+ is very superior(gifted);I am not sure if the British WISC is the same as the WISC III used here.

Submitted by Anonymous on Sat, 05/11/2002 - 7:56 PM

Permalink

I posted this before, but a great site is http://alpha.fdu.edu/psychology/learning_disabilites.htm It has an article that explains the effect of speed on the performance subtests of picture arrangement, block design and object assembly that gives you the top score for a certain age without the bonus points for speed, and you can see that as your child gets older to get the higher performance scores they NEED to get the bonus pts for speed; so it’s not that they’re losing skills, it’s that the bar is set higher. Search on Ron Dumont on google, he’s one of the authors of this site and he has written a lot on testing.

Submitted by Anonymous on Sun, 05/12/2002 - 7:52 PM

Permalink

I have been on this site a number of times and actually “spoke” with Ron Dumont before. His site doesn’t give the type of info that the English post did. It really helped to understand what the test means and what problems may arise from the low score, and it helps to know what support is needed.

Thanks
K.

Submitted by Anonymous on Wed, 05/15/2002 - 7:41 PM

Permalink

It really shouldn’t be compared to the US WISC. To top it off, some of the information (like the ACID test) was debunked ten years ago. Read cautiously.

Back to Top