Common Pediatric Anesthesia Drugs Cause Brain Damage In Infant Rats
Also causes learning and memory problems
[For the iatrogenic theories of autism department.]
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-02/wuso-cpa013003.php
A team of researchers from the University of Virginia Health System and Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis has found that drugs commonly used to anesthetize children can cause brain damage and long-term learning and memory disturbances in infant rats. The researchers report their findings in the Feb. 1 issue of the Journal of Neuroscience.
“We frequently perform surgical procedures on children, including premature infants, and those procedures have become increasingly more complex and take longer to perform,” says the study’s lead author Vesna Jevtovic-Todorovic, M.D., associate professor of anesthesiology at the University of Virginia Health System. “That means many pediatric patients are being exposed to anesthetic drugs more frequently and for longer periods of time. Our results would suggest that might be problematic.”
Previously, Jevtovic-Todorovic was at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, where the rest of the research team is located. The investigators anesthetized 7-day-old rats with a combination of three drugs — midazolam, nitrous oxide and isoflurane — commonly used in pediatric surgery. As the animals recovered from the anesthesia, the researchers divided them into three groups: One group was sacrificed the next day and their brains examined, a second group grew to be about a month old and a third group grew into adulthood. The latter two groups were tested for effects of anesthesia on learning and memory.
Members of the research team also recorded electrical activity in the hippocampus, a brain structure known to be important in learning and memory. “These infant rats were anesthetized during the brain growth spurt period called synaptogenesis, which lasts for the first few weeks of life in rats, but in humans it extends from the third trimester of pregnancy until about age 3,” says senior investigator John W. Olney, M.D., the John P. Feighner Professor of Neuropsychopharmacology at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis. “During this period, nerve cells in the brain make connections with one another and form large networks. But if something interferes with that process, the cells are programmed to kill themselves.”
In this study, the team found moderately severe cell death had occurred in several brain regions in every brain examined. This included brain regions involved in learning and memory such as hippocampus. In addition, the rats exposed to anesthesia in infancy had significant learning and memory deficits, both at 1 month of age and in adulthood. Rats were tested in several kinds of mazes that behavioral scientists commonly use to evaluate learning and memory. In all of these tests, rats that had been anesthetized in infancy were significantly worse than those that had not been given the standard anesthesia drug combination.
The researchers also examined brain slices from the hippocampus of month-old rats. They ran electrical currents through those slices to induce a process known as long-term potentiation (LTP), which is thought to occur during learning and memory formation. Brain slices from rats who had been anesthetized with the three drug “cocktail” had far less LTP activity than normal.
“In each part of this study, we found essentially what we expected,” Jevtovic-Todorovic says. “Once we had confirmed cell death, we would have expected behavioral deficits, and we found those as the rats grew into adulthood. In the electrophysiological experiments, we also found evidence of disturbances in the neural circuits of the hippocampus, the brain region which, through those circuits, plays an important role in learning and memory.”
The team also found that the rats appeared to behave normally in most other ways, and there were no outward signs of brain damage. “That’s important because if similar brain damage had occurred in a human infant, it appears there would not be any overt signs that would alert you to it,” Olney says. This study fits together with a line of research that has repeatedly identified a relationship between certain classes of drugs that inhibit nerve cell activity and damage to the developing brain.
Anesthetic drugs work in one of two ways, both of which inhibit nerve cell activity: Either they inhibit excitatory neurotransmission in the brain or they enhance inhibitory neurotransmission. The excitatory system that stimulates nerve cells is what scientists call the NMDA glutamate transmitter system.
In 1998, Jevtovic-Todorovic discovered that the drug nitrous oxide, or laughing gas, work by inhibiting the NMDA glutamate system. Another anesthetic drug known as Ketamine, also works by inhibiting the NMDA glutamate system. Other anesthetic drugs work by enhancing the inhibitory activity of GABA (Gamma Amino Butyric Acid). GABA is the primary inhibitory transmitter in the brain.
In related research, Olney and colleagues in Germany demonstrated that when the developing brain is exposed to drugs that block NMDA glutamate activity, nerve cells in the brain commit suicide. They also found that drugs that enhance GABA activity can cause nerve cells in the developing brain to self-destruct.
The above findings prompted them to study alcohol, which is known to block NMDA glutamate activity and also to enhance GABA activity. They found that alcohol powerfully triggers nerve cell suicide in the developing brain, providing a likely explanation for the learning and memory disturbances associated with the human fetal alcohol syndrome.
More recently, Olney and colleagues demonstrated that sodium channel blocking drugs used in pediatric medicine to manage epilepsy also cause nerve cell suicide in the infant rat brain.
“In all of these studies, we have found that drugs that enhance GABA inhibition or that inhibit glutamate excitation can trigger massive cell suicide in the developing brain,” Olney says. “If you put nerve cells to sleep when they are supposed to be making connections, it interferes with their timing, and nerve cells are programmed to kill themselves if they don’t make their connections on time.”
Part of the reason cells are programmed to self-destruct is that there is redundancy built into the system. An infant is born with an excess number of nerve cells, and some cell death is normal in the developing brain. But Olney’s team has found that when drugs interfere with the cell and put it to sleep when it is trying to make connections, the suicide rate rises to abnormally high proportions.
Previous studies by these researchers have helped explain how abuse of certain drugs, including alcohol, can damage the developing brain. But in the present study by Jevtovic-Todorovic and colleagues, the investigators found that drugs used commonly in pediatric anesthesia also can damage the developing brain.
According to Olney, this is a serious dilemma because anesthesia is required to do surgery, and surgery is the only option for some infants with life-threatening problems. “But some pediatric surgery is elective,” Olney says. “In light of these findings, I would recommend that if surgery really does not have to be performed early in life, it would be prudent to postpone it.”
The investigators also suggest that some surgical procedures might not require general anesthesia, or in some cases the duration of general anesthesia could be reduced. They also say that the common practice of keeping newborns continuously sedated in pediatric intensive care units should carefully be evaluated in order to minimize potential damage from these dating drugs.
Re: This really hits home!!
My son had his appendix out in preschool. Ear infections, traumatic birth, ld family history, amazing the kid is still standing.
Re: This really hits home!!
My daughter had several surgeries between birth and age 2 also. What I don’t understand is why the LD issues didn’t become apparent until the 4th grade?!
Perhaps more research will give vlearer direction and earlier intervention.
Maternal chickenpox at birth
That was our trauma. He was given a gamma globulin shot, antibiotics and a had a short stay in the NICU. Then he had the chicken pox himself at 2 weeks and was given acyclovir. We have no family history of LD so I do think this experience may have caused neurological damage. On the other hand, you can’t make yourself crazy about doing what needs to be done to help your infant. Chickenpox can be fatal in newborns so I try to keep it all in perspective.
Re: Maternal chickenpox at birth
YES…shortly after my nephew was dx’d Duchennes Muscular Dystrophy, a lady moved in down the street from my sister who had just lost her children…in a much publicized crash where a drunk driver hit her babysitters car while driving kids to school in the AM…sure got our pain into perspective.
My son had dental surgery at 2.5yrs and tonsils/adenoids at 5…but he is SO like his Dad and like two of my cousins, and the other ‘math gaps’ are just like MOM…so, chilling as this is, I”m with you and am quite thankful for my GOOD luck!
why they don't show up...
It is very common for children with mild LD’s to be undiagnosed until late childhood or even to make it to adulthood without proper diagnosis.
Having an LD does NOT mean that your are stupid. It is not uncommon to have an LD AND be gifted at the same time.
One very big problem with the current Sped service model that is widely used is the discrepancy formula. Rather than evaluate all children for the presence of LD’s (such as dyslexia) when these children are very young (so much for universal EI services), unless a child is obviously challenged the schools take a wait and see approach. This is done most often to conserve budget, but also because of ill-trained and inexperienced diagnostic staff, lack of adequate staffing to handle a larger caseload, or a mistaken belief that there are dumb kids and the world needs garbagemen and burger flippers.
So if you have a child who is actually of average or higher than average intelligence, even gifted in some areas, but has a problem such as dyslexia, it can be possible to get by for several years without trigger the two year discrepancy benchmark. As long as your child is able to get just enough passing marks to only be a year behind his grade, the schools allow him to flounder. I liken this to a person slowly drowning in water that is only a foot above their head. As long as they can keep hitting bottom and kicking up for a gasp, the life guard does not need to leave the tower.
What the short focused administrators fail to grasp is:
1) the human mind is never more malleable than it is between 3 and 8, so any interventions undertaken at that time will have the greatest impact in the shortest time
2) the cost of running an intensive program for young children is far cheaper than the cost of running a similar program when they are teens (prices will continue to creep and the longer period needed to achieve results coupled with the greater discrepancy to overcome compound this)
3) the emotional cost to the family as they struggle to advocate, and especially the child who must live thru years of wondering why they don’t seem to get it like other kids, being called lazy or stupid, etc. could be greatly avoided by more proactive intervention tactics
and 4) every additional year of struggle by a child who has an LD unaddressed increases the likelihood that negative behaviors will increase, which taes a toll on all parties involved, parents, student, peers and teachers.
One of my best friends is an industrial painter, and works on a variety of surfaces including bridges, electrical towers, industrial plants, etc. The motto of his union is “it is cheaper to paint it”. By this it is meant that spending the money and effort prepping and painting structures especially steel is cheaper in the long run than allow rust to degrade the structure to the point it needs major renovation or even fails altogether.
We can see this same philosophy applies in Sped services, where the action of early intensive intervention can turn tomorrow’s losers into people who can achieve. It is not coincidence that the percentage of men in prison with unremediated dyslexia is at least 10 times higher than the percentage of children with dyslexia in school.
If we are going to turn this bad system of letting the child fail before we help them into a proactive system of aggressively diagnosing LD’s and offering proper programming to remediate we are going to need all parties to work on the same page, parents, teachers and administrators. A very good first step will be to work in unison to demand that Congress finally do what they have been promising for 25 years, namely funding IDEA.
I can think of nothing more worthy than assisting a child in need, and few things more critical to our countries future than exploiting all possible talent that we have while at the same time reducing the number of people who will be at high risk for being institutionalized or incarcerated.
Plain and simple, find out your Congressman’s voting record on Sped funding, and if they did not vote in favor of full funding vote for the other guy. Regardless who it is.
I am floored. We are just starting down the ld path w/my 8 year old son. It appears he has dsylexia/dsygraphia. My otherwise very bright son is having some serious problems with reading and writing.
At the age of 2 months he underwent a surgical procedure for pylormic stenosis. At 9 months he underwent a procedure for ear tubes, at 18 months he had a endoscope to take a biopsy of his stomach. All relating back to the original surgery. To think that possibly the medicines used for his surgeries are now causing his learing problems is very upsetting. I wish we had been more informed at the time.
Thank you for posting this information. I hope that this research will get out to the general public so people can make the best choices for their children.