Skip to main content

TV viewing and ADD

Submitted by an LD OnLine user on

Attention Deficit Linked to TV Viewing
Risk to Children Increases With Number of Hours Watched, Study Finds

Monday, April 5, 2004; Page A07

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A50301-2004Apr4.html

CHICAGO, April 4 — Very young children who watch television face an increased risk of attention deficit problems by school age, a study has found, suggesting that TV might overstimulate and permanently “rewire” the developing brain.

For every hour of television watched daily, two groups of children — ages 1 and 3 — faced a 10 percent increased risk of having attention problems at age 7.

The findings bolster previous research showing that television can shorten attention spans and support recommendations by the American Academy of Pediatrics that children younger than 2 should not watch television.

“The truth is there are lots of reasons for children not to watch television. Other studies have shown it to be associated with obesity and aggressiveness,” said lead author Dimitri A. Christakis, a researcher at Children’s Hospital and Regional Medical Center in Seattle.

The study, appearing in the April issue of Pediatrics, involved 1,345 children who participated in government-sponsored national health surveys. Parents answered questions about the children’s TV viewing and rated their behavior at age 7 on a scale similar to measures used in diagnosing attention deficit disorders.

The researchers lacked data on whether attention deficit disorders had been diagnosed in the youngsters, but the number of children whose parents rated them as having attention problems — 10 percent — is similar to the prevalence in the general population, Christakis said. Problems included difficulty concentrating, acting restless and impulsive and being easily confused.

About 36 percent of the 1-year-olds watched no TV, while 37 percent watched one to two hours daily and had a 10 percent to 20 percent increased risk of attention problems. Fourteen percent watched three to four hours daily and had a 30 percent to 40 percent increased risk compared with children who watched no TV. The remainder watched at least five hours daily.

Among 3-year-olds, only 7 percent watched no TV, 44 percent watched one to two hours daily, 27 percent watched three to four hours daily, almost 11 percent watched five to six hours daily, and about 10 percent watched seven or more hours daily.

In a Pediatrics editorial, educational psychologist Jane M. Healy said the study “is important and long overdue” but needs to be followed up to better explain the mechanisms that may be involved.

Christakis said unrealistically fast-paced images typical of most TV programming may alter normal brain development.

“The newborn brain develops very rapidly during the first two to three years of life. It’s really being wired” during that time, Christakis said.

Overstimulation during this critical period “can create habits of the mind that are ultimately deleterious,” Christakis said. If this theory holds true, the brain changes likely are permanent, but children with attention problems can be taught to compensate, he said.

Jennifer Kotler, assistant director for research at Sesame Workshop, which produces children’s programs including “Sesame Street,” questioned whether the results would apply to educational programming.

“We do not ignore this research,” but more is needed on variables that could affect the impact of early exposure to television, including whether content or watching TV with a parent makes a difference, Kotler said.

“There’s a lot of research … that supports the positive benefits of educational programming,” she said.

Submitted by Roxie on Tue, 04/06/2004 - 11:29 AM

Permalink

Is there a difference between “Attention Defict” and “Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder”? There seems to be a lot of limitations to this study. While I believe that parents are a great resource for information, when it comes to the outcomes of a study, it’s not enough to base finding on. They clearly didn’t identify if any of these children had prior attentional challenges. I can’t seem to find how they measured the attentional differences in these kids other than parent reports. I don’t even see something as basic as a time on task test.
I agree, excessive TV watching is not a good thing. The images on TV, even in kids cartooning, is often inappropriate for kids of this age. Look at most kid shows, parents are often depicted as slightly less than able to get the job done while it’s the kids that come a long and figure out the solution. Great that kids can see themself as able, but at the expense of parents? I won’t even go to the violence, and I don’t care what anyone says, after a couple of “Power Ranger” type shows, many kids ARE going around punching, kicking, and hitting more. TV can also be a mindless event. A person can check out while watching TV, an attractive event for an ADHDer whose brain has been on overload. Also, excessive TV watching leads to decreased interaction among peers, siblings, and even with parents. Less parenting takes place. When a parent isn’t interacting with their children, less skills are being taught. Kids don’t learn the organizational skills of cleaning and doing chores, the social skills of interacting with others, and the little learning tasks they do by helping bake, cook, do puzzles, get read to or read themselves.
It’s just too easy to blame TV, there are so many other factors here that haven’t been accounted for.

Submitted by Anonymous on Tue, 04/06/2004 - 12:16 PM

Permalink

TV is not a good thing for kids. It provides constant stimulation. I think video and computer games fall in this same category. They provide constant, immediate feedback. Kids do not have to learn to think.

Submitted by Jan Raper on Tue, 04/06/2004 - 1:33 PM

Permalink

I’m very concerned about my ADHD son playing video games! Just last

night his dad and I decided he will NOT be able to play video games

during the week. The reason is that is all he thinks about during

homeschooling and any other time. It is really getting to be obsessive.We

will be in the middle of a lesson and he will start talking about something

to do with a game. He simply can’t get it off his mind! I tell him I’m not

going to discuss it till we are finished but he continues to talk about it

every few mins. Sometimes we will be in the middle of a spelling word

and he starts in about it. How can you possibly be concentrating on

spelling a word if you are talking about something else?He is 12 and this

has not been an easy yr. homeschooling. I’ll actually be glad when it is

over. Thanks for letting me vent!! Jan

Submitted by Dad on Tue, 04/06/2004 - 1:49 PM

Permalink

I do not think that this study is ready to stand alone yet, nor do I think it is an attempt to blame ADD on television viewing as sole cause.

It may or may not turn out to be a contributing factor towards triggering a laten attention problem, or in making a mild case worse. If brain platicity is a valid theory, then it can work in bad ways as well as good. Television has changed ove there years, as has much of media. We have seen entertainment go from “slow paced” dialogue intensive scripts to “fast-paced” action with rapidly changing images and sounds. It stands to reason that just as reading to your child would strengthen neural pathways to encourage language and reading skills, watching excessive amounts of television would establish neural pathways which operate to process rapid fire input.

Again, while I do not think that TV alone will explain ADD, it may represent a piece of the puzzle which is easily controllable. I will watch for the peer review criticisms to see what flaws this study contained. If anyone else sees such follow up, please post it on this thread.

Submitted by Anonymous on Tue, 04/06/2004 - 1:54 PM

Permalink

This study frustrates me. I understand the logic between linking ADHD and TV viewing but I honestly can’t make that connection with my son. I wish he watched more TV :wink: Sometimes I feel like everyone is just looking for another way to blame the parents for their child’s issues. Just needed to vent!

Submitted by Cathryn on Tue, 04/06/2004 - 2:37 PM

Permalink

Guest wrote:

<<TV is not a good thing for kids. It provides constant stimulation. I think video and computer games fall in this same category. They provide constant, immediate feedback. Kids do not have to learn to think.>>

While I am in full agreement that too much TV cannot be good for *any* child, I wouldn’t lump video games in with TV. My 14 year old nephew did his Science Project this year on video games improving eye-hand coordination, and supposedly (I don’t know the specifics of his experiment) it does. It wasn’t just a bogus science project, done just to get by. This kid is very smart.

Personally, I find video games to be silly, but I know my daughters couldn’t live without that little hedgehog “Sonic”. But I do limit their time playing it. They’d play for hours on end if they could.

Submitted by Anonymous on Tue, 04/06/2004 - 2:42 PM

Permalink

The main problem with this study is that the researchers apparently did not consider the possibility that children with pre-existing attentional difficulties are prone to watching more TV because it is fast paced enough to capture their attention. This is entirely consistent with the results they report. In another report of the study I read that the researchers did control for the effect of “mother’s mood” on attentional difficulties. To me, this suggests a certain bias on their part.

Submitted by Beth from FL on Tue, 04/06/2004 - 3:59 PM

Permalink

My husband and I hardly watch TV but our LD/ADD child watched it as a preschooler more than he should have. Why? Because it was the only way to get any peace. I am sure it was not a good idea but I was trying to survive. So I do agree that certain kinds of kids who are at risk anyway may be the ones watching too much.

I actually think the video games are worse than TV, at least for certain kinds of kids. My LD/ADD child becomes horribly irritated if anyone interupts his thoughts and actions. It has improved his hand eye coordination, which was weak, but I also think they encourage/are consistent with the hyperfocusing that many ADD children tend towards anyway. I also see my youngest (ADHD like but not diagnosed) becoming addicted to them. We exercise major parental controls —no games during week, for example.

Currently we can’t find our clicker (space cadet me lost it) and the poor darlings haven’t been able to play for two weeks. I can’t say I am sorry!! (can’t switch from TV to video without clicker).

I also think video games and probably TV to some extent contribute to the inability to work through or be interested in anything that isn’t fast paced and exciting. In other words, school work. I see that with our neighbor child who is allowed to play many more hours than our kids. He just doesn’t want to do anything that isn’t exciting. He gets bored easily. Now he is inclined that way anyway but I think video games make it worse. My youngest is very much inclined the same way and that is one reason I limit him so much.

Dr. Amen who wrote a book on ADHD says basically the same sorts of stuff about video games and ADHD. I don’t recall what if anything he said about TV because that isn’t really an issue in our house.

Beth

Submitted by victoria on Tue, 04/06/2004 - 4:38 PM

Permalink

I have a number of friends and students’ parents who watch little or no TV. Many are European and had much less TV choice when young, but some choose deliberately to stop or plan their children’s watching.

The kids with very limited TV do seem to be much more social and more self-reliant.

We had no TV until my daughter was eight and I am glad of it.
It is interesting that the friends she chose for herself in high school were also low TV watchers — they had so many other interests to talk about and participate in.

If anyone asks me, I would recommend cutting it back to deliberately chosen programs — both educational and well-written entertainment, hopefully nonviolent — and turning it off after, not just leaving it on to see if anything happens, and not just leaving the kid with the clicker.

A lot of people leave the child to make choices, figuring that he’ll learn to make good ones. That unfortunately doesn’t work since the bad choices are carefully planned and marketed to be addictive.

I have to honestly admit that this is presently “do as I say and not as I do” advice, since I’ve been leaving my TV on far too much, but I have been housebound with illness and injuries, and that isn’t true of a physically healthy child. Even then it’s more more on Discovery and CNN and CBC comedy than much else.

Submitted by victoria on Tue, 04/06/2004 - 4:39 PM

Permalink

I have a number of friends and students’ parents who watch little or no TV. Many are European and had much less TV choice when young, but some choose deliberately to stop or plan their children’s watching.

The kids with very limited TV do seem to be much more social and more self-reliant.

We had no TV until my daughter was eight and I am glad of it.
It is interesting that the friends she chose for herself in high school were also low TV watchers — they had so many other interests to talk about and participate in.

If anyone asks me, I would recommend cutting it back to deliberately chosen programs — both educational and well-written entertainment, hopefully nonviolent — and turning it off after, not just leaving it on to see if anything happens, and not just leaving the kid with the clicker.

A lot of people leave the child to make choices, figuring that he’ll learn to make good ones. That unfortunately doesn’t work since the bad choices are carefully planned and marketed to be addictive.

I have to honestly admit that this is presently “do as I say and not as I do” advice, since I’ve been leaving my TV on far too much, but I have been housebound with illness and injuries, and that isn’t true of a physically healthy child. Even then it’s more more on Discovery and CNN and CBC comedy than much else.

Submitted by Dad on Tue, 04/06/2004 - 5:04 PM

Permalink

I think that guest raises a valid point about “the chicken and the egg”. I am not sure how we can control for the possibility that a pre-existing condition steers people into activities which are then seen to be the cause. I reckon if we worked strictly with identical twins, allowed one twin from each pair to watch tv in chosen intervals, and then screened all of them after several years for ADD we would have an answer, but I am not sure we can ethically do something like that, can we?

PS guest, choose a nickname, would ya?

Submitted by Cathryn on Tue, 04/06/2004 - 6:42 PM

Permalink

My daughters lost the “clicker” once, a few months back. I was furious, because the telelvision was set to their video game, and I couldn’t watch anything, not even news or weather! This went on for a few DAYS. Now, I don’t watch a lot of TV, just in the evenings sometimes, after they go to bed.

So now, my girls NEVER have the clicker in their possession. It is much better that way anyway, yes?

Last night, I had to literally chase my older daughter out of the living room, because she was insisting on watching “Law and Order” with me. That show is one of the few vices I have left, I admit it, but there’s NO WAY that show is suitable for an almost 11-year-old.

There’s a great deal more to the story of last night, but I’ll post it on my thread later on tonight. No time now, but it’s an important, and probably LONG one.

Submitted by Roxie on Tue, 04/06/2004 - 9:38 PM

Permalink

Dad you wrote:
[quote=”Dad”]I do not think that this study is ready to stand alone yet, nor do I think it is an attempt to blame ADD on television viewing as sole cause. ”

I’m sure that they weren’t trying to say those things, but on 3 boards so far I have seen the trend, the posters are reading this article and getting the same impression you did, just as you wrote in your subject heading
“TV Vieiwing and ADD” The article called it attention deficit, short of calling it a disorder, but the impression is clear.
And as I said in my earlier post, which guest echoed. There is no consideration to prior attentional issues. The researchers, from what I can tell, also did not control for so many possible variables, I see no mention of a control group, and the parents were the only respondents assessing an increase in ‘attentional” issues. Maybe, hopefully, there is more to this study, although I would think even in an abstract or review they would like to mention at least some of these points if they were considered. If nothing else, the study raises more questions than it answers (which is good). And may warrant further study on this issue. What a waste of money to study something we already know, kids watch too much TV.

It may or may not turn out to be a contributing factor towards triggering a laten attention problem, or in making a mild case worse. If brain platicity is a valid theory, then it can work in bad ways as well as good. Television has changed ove there years, as has much of media. We have seen entertainment go from “slow paced” dialogue intensive scripts to “fast-paced” action with rapidly changing images and sounds. It stands to reason that just as reading to your child would strengthen neural pathways to encourage language and reading skills, watching excessive amounts of television would establish neural pathways which operate to process rapid fire input.

Again, while I do not think that TV alone will explain ADD, it may represent a piece of the puzzle which is easily controllable. I will watch for the peer review criticisms to see what flaws this study contained. If anyone else sees such follow up, please post it on this thread.[/quote]

Submitted by TerryB on Tue, 04/06/2004 - 10:20 PM

Permalink

What a sloppy study and what a waste of taxpayer money! There could indeed be a causative effect from TV but the study doesn’t appear to prove it. Only an association has been found.

My kids might watch PBS once per week at most because I strongly believe that it is bad for them for a number of reasons. We thought, for one thing, that boredom is something that all people need to deal with and they need to be able to create their own fun. It nearly killed us to restrict TV because my daughter is so intense and we need a break from her sometimes.

TV in excess is bad for kids but the government and physicians need to always seek the truth or people won’t take anything that they say seriously. There are serious flaws in the study so it means nothing to me except than I would like a more scientific follow-up study. The media loves to work everybody up and then another study will come along and refute the findings of the study.

Everyone should suspect that TV can be unhealthly for kids but lets get the evidence straight. The government shouldn’t need to do bogus research to try to sway public opinion. Why couldn’t they have spent the research money more wisely? And yes, “social research” is very difficult but couldn’t they come up with something better than a survey!

Terry

Submitted by Jan Raper on Tue, 04/06/2004 - 11:15 PM

Permalink

Terry, I think you are correct!! If a study is done there needs to be a

double blind study. This was ridiculous in my opinion. I’m not a scientist

but I know this was done incorrectly. I also don’t think kids need to watch

TV all the time, but to say it is what causes ADHD is ludicrous!!I think

ADHD has been around for generations. ADHD was here BEFORE TV!!!! It

is looked at as being something BAD now because they can’t warehouse

students into one learning mode! Years ago, I believe they either felt the

child was retarded or lazy in many instances. And, Yes ,some astute

teachers realized these students thought outside the norm. They were

either encouraged or they were flunked! I believe these students are

our future scientists and specialists.Knowing what I know now, I am sure

many of these students were beaten when I was in school and still are till

this day in states that allow paddling!!! Many of these kids also drop out of

school. When will the public school system come to terms with children

that don’t fit the NORM!!! ? Jan

Submitted by Cathryn on Wed, 04/07/2004 - 1:25 AM

Permalink

“When will the public school system come to terms with children

that don’t fit the NORM!!! ? Jan”

Amen to that, Jan. And not just public schools, all of them.

Submitted by Beth from FL on Thu, 04/08/2004 - 1:51 AM

Permalink

I heard on the radio going to work this morning about a study that concluded that surgeons who played video games made fewer mistakes and did surgery quicker than those who did not.

So, guess for whatever I and others don’t like about video games they have some positive effects, at least if your kids are going to be surgeons!!!

A screening question for your surgeon?

Beth

Submitted by JenM on Thu, 04/08/2004 - 11:31 AM

Permalink

Maybe it depends on the game? A lot of people report that Dance Dance Revolution is very similar in results to Interactive Metronome which is supposed to help with attention skills. We had Santa bring the game because we thought we could get therapeutic results without my kids knowing it. It meant that we had to get Playstation because previous to that it was not permitted in the house. So, I gave in for that reason but stipulated absolutely no fighting games. My kids have never been allowed to watch Power Rangers or Cartoon Network. So, we’ve had the Playstation system since Christmas and still have only played DDR which is fine. My older daughter loves it and I can really see where it could help her coordination. Cathryn, your daughter might really enjoy this one! My younger daughter’s school sends home Playstation games from a series called Lightspan which are educational games. It’s a great concept but my daughter really isn’t interested in playing any of the games which is fine with me! I’d rather she do something more creative anyway!

Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 04/08/2004 - 2:42 PM

Permalink

Even more interesting re video games is that a study comparing non-violent video games to IM reported that children diagnosed with ADHD who played the games showed gains in attention on several test measures. IM treated children gained slightly more and children who got no treatment did not show any significant gain.

Submitted by Cathryn on Thu, 04/08/2004 - 3:35 PM

Permalink

Hi Jen,

My girls don’t even know who the Power Rangers are, and I really dislike the Cartoon Network. A good deal of the shows on that network are not fit for children, IMHO. The only show they watch on that station are the PowerPuff Girls, and then only occasionally.

They do watch Nickelodeon. They love SpongeBob, and while I can’t say that I’m a fan, I find it to be harmless, and occasionally I find myself laughing at the silliness of it.

My girls have the GameCube. I got a used one at the Mall at a great price. I was debating over the PlayStation, or the GameCube, er, I mean, Santa was (lol), but the only game they wanted was “Sonic” the little blue HedgeHog, and the GameCube is the best one for that particular game. I wish I had gotten the PlaySation though, because it doubles as a DVD player, and item I do not possess. Before that, we had an ancient Sega Genesis that was given to us by a friend, but it stopped working. That’s how they were introduced to “Sonic”.

The game is called Dance Dance Revolution? I will see if that’s available for the GameCube. Thanks for the info, Jen.

Submitted by KarenN on Sun, 04/11/2004 - 12:59 AM

Permalink

ah TV. Well, my LD son is my first child and he watched very little TV, and when he did it was all PBS! My neurotypical child (the 2nd) watches alot more then her brother did for her age and she’s just fine.

I do limit it but frankly my son works his tush off all day , can’t read for pleasure (yet!) and if he needs to unwind with a favorite tv show I don’t feel I should withhold that.

I do limit the video games, despite the fact that they are more interactive, because we have noticed a correlation between video game playing and some mild tics he has had over the last 6 months.

Finally, I think the whole game boy/video game thing is practically a requirement for a normal socially savvy 9 year old boy, and the last thing my ds needs is to be more uncool.

Submitted by Anonymous on Mon, 04/12/2004 - 7:03 PM

Permalink

TV viewing is not the cause of classic ADHD at all which is known to have existed long before radio and tv. Experts who claim that all of ADHD can be cured by not watching TV are never to be trusted or believed ever.

Incorrect information about ADHD is dangerous and unprofessional.

That’s my view.

Submitted by Anonymous on Tue, 04/13/2004 - 11:50 PM

Permalink

<<TV viewing is not the cause of classic ADHD at all which is known to have existed long before radio and tv. Experts who claim that all of ADHD can be cured by not watching TV are never to be trusted or believed ever.

Incorrect information about ADHD is dangerous and unprofessional.

That’s my view.[/quote]>>

PGD,

I definitely agree with you. I have family history of ADHD that goes way back.

PT

Submitted by Anonymous on Wed, 04/14/2004 - 6:30 PM

Permalink

TV has become a baby sitter for parents who should not have kids. That article make a lot of sense. It’s too bad that the schools and doctors reject developmental neurology. That’s OK we can just drug em :D

Back to Top